VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mazda 3 Sedan comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 25,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mazda 3 Sedan?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mazda 3 Sedan: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space

Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda 3 Sedan is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,451 £.

3 Sedan

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 301 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda 3 Sedan takes 8.1 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 710 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is substantially lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 741 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers a bit more boot space – 519 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 69 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Sedan carries only slightly more – 481 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mazda 3 Sedan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mazda 3 Sedan

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
25,000 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
123 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,492 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
450 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
467 - 481 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.