VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs VW T-Cross comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or VW T-Cross?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs VW T-Cross: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

VW T-Cross

4 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Cross is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,034 £.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers substantially more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 337 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.4 s. That’s about 4.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 700 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is considerably lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 894 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers somewhat more boot space – 519 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 64 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Cross carries very slightly more – 480 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri and the Ford Mustang Mach-E represent two very different takes on driving pleasure—one a classic sporty coupe with nostalgic charm, the other a modern all-electric crossover with high-tech performance. This comparison will help you weigh classic style and driving feel against …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and the VW T-Cross are closely matched compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a touch of SUV style. This comparison focuses on space, fuel economy, driving feel, safety and running costs to help you decide which suits your …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
Roel
10 Jun 2026, 04:25:36

Incredibly beautiful SUV. The most beautiful one out there in terms of style.
The interior could be a bit more modern... but the seats feel amazing.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

4 (5 Reviews)
rate
Arturo
27 May 2026, 04:19:26

In terms of interior space and driving, the T‑Cross is far superior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Yaris Cross and the VW T‑Cross means deciding whether you want Toyota’s hybrid efficiency and nimble city manners or Volkswagen’s more conventional, spacious small SUV package. The Yaris Cross focuses on low running costs and urban agility, while the T‑Cross delivers a …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Explorer EV swaps the Mustang Mach‑E’s athletic poise for SUV practicality, three-row space and a taller stance — ideal if you need family duties, towing and sensible range without sacrificing slick tech. But if you crave sharper handling, a sportier silhouette and a more emotional drive, …
VW T-Cross
VW Taigo
VS
Meet the VW T‑Cross and VW Taigo: two compact crossovers from Volkswagen chasing the same urban buyers but with very different personalities — the practical, upright T‑Cross versus the swoopy, style-first Taigo. Read on to see which one earns a place in your driveway, whether you prize family …
VW Golf
VW T-Cross
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Cross comes down to whether you want a traditional hatchback with sharper driving dynamics or a compact crossover that prioritizes space, practicality and a higher seating position. The Golf rewards with more engaging handling and a refined interior, while …
Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Renault Captur dazzles with bold styling, quirky customization and clever interior tricks, while the VW T-Cross takes a quieter route—solid build, practical space and no-nonsense usability. Choose the Captur if you want personality and fun; pick the T‑Cross if …
VW T-Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volkswagen T-Cross and T-Roc are compact SUVs that share family DNA but target different buyers. The T-Cross prioritizes urban practicality, low running costs and easy parking, while the T-Roc offers more interior space, stronger engine options and a sportier driving character.
Opel Frontera
VW T-Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Opel Frontera and the VW T-Cross, the Frontera stands out with its robust off-road capabilities and rugged design, catering to adventure enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the T-Cross impresses with its urban practicality, spacious interior, and advanced tech features, …
Toyota Corolla Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
Toyota Corolla Cross and VW T-Cross go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Toyota Corolla …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.