VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes EQT - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (487 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (48400 £ vs 27800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mercedes EQT?

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3 (2 Reviews)
rate

Mercedes EQT

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mercedes EQT has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 27800 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20654 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Mustang Mach-E: with 17.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Mercedes EQT with 19.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.80 kWh.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E performs clearly better – achieving up to 600 km, about 322 km more than the Mercedes EQT.

EQT

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has a decisively edge – offering 487 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 365 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.60 s. That’s about 8.80 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Mustang Mach-E pulls decisively stronger with 950 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 705 Nm difference.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mercedes EQT is a bit lighter – 1925 kg compared to 2161 kg. The difference is around 236 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers minimal more room – 551 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQT a bit takes the win – 531 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes EQT

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Mercedes EQT

The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes EQT

Costs and Consumption

Price
48400 - 66900 £
Price
27800 - 32100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2161 - 2351 kg
Curb weight
1925 - 2023 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
Length
-
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
Width
1881 mm
Width
1859 mm
Height
-
Height
1819 - 1830 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1979 L
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
457 - 531 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.60 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
132 km/h
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
90 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023 - 2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drive types are available for the Ford Mustang Mach-E?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.