Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes EQT comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mercedes EQT?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes EQT: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes EQT is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,654 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is moderately more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers substantially more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 322 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
EQT
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 365 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 8.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 705 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQT is a bit lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 236 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers marginally more boot space – 551 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries a bit more – 531 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.