Compare performance (487 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or MINI Aceman?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MINI Aceman is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,428 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 3.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers significantly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 245 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers substantially more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 229 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers significantly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 600 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is clearly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 441 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers clearly more boot space – 519 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 219 L.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries somewhat more – 530 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
detailsThe MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
MINI
|