VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is moderately cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,294 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is marginally more efficient: consuming 16.7 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 635 km, about 35 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.

Eclipse Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers significantly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 269 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes 7.9 s. That’s about 4.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 650 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers marginally more boot space – 519 L compared to 487 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross combines coupe-like looks with crossover practicality, so you get style without the showroom attitude. It’s an affable daily driver that hides a few quirks behind a confident grin, making it an easy pick for buyers who want personality without fuss.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
41,100 - 48,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 16.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
635 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
-
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
487 L
Length
-
Length
4,489 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,908 mm
Height
-
Height
1,571 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,670 L
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
218 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
170 km/h
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
160 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.