VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • moderately more power
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 226,972 £.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers moderately more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 113 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan takes 4.9 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers barely more torque with 950 Nm compared to 900 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is noticeably lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 499 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers barely more boot space – 555 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries clearly more – 840 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 390 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.