VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs SEAT Arona comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 20,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or SEAT Arona?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs SEAT Arona: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

SEAT Arona

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

SEAT Arona is considerably cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,728 £.

Arona

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 337 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the SEAT Arona takes 8.3 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers substantially more torque with 950 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 700 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, SEAT Arona is significantly lighter – 1,188 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 973 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers noticeably more boot space – 519 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 119 L.

When it comes to payload, the SEAT Arona carries slightly more – 522 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 72 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Capri
Ford Mustang Mach-E
VS
The Ford Capri and the Ford Mustang Mach-E represent two very different takes on driving pleasure—one a classic sporty coupe with nostalgic charm, the other a modern all-electric crossover with high-tech performance. This comparison will help you weigh classic style and driving feel against …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
SEAT Arona

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_23-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_19-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_24-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_05-LOW
2020_FORD_MACH-E_AWD_09-LOW

Reviews Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
Roel
10 Jun 2026, 04:25:36

Incredibly beautiful SUV. The most beautiful one out there in terms of style.
The interior could be a bit more modern... but the seats feel amazing.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvo Trimbos
15 Mar 2026, 19:07:15

Lovely car with sporty handling and fantastic seats.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
M
7 Dec 2025, 19:35:44

Rubbish car.

Features clearly not as polished as other EV SUVs at similar prices (e.g. Volvo EX40 / BYD Sealion 7))

Alarms about driver fatigues every 10 minutes.

Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:28:23

Well-built car, reasonably priced — unlike the inflated costs of German cars.

SEAT Arona

The SEAT Arona is a compact crossover that blends practical, city-friendly packaging with a sporty, youthful design. It delivers a comfortable ride, an intuitive cabin and economical running costs, making it a sensible pick for daily drives and weekend getaways.

details
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_07_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_06_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_04_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_02_HQ

Reviews SEAT Arona

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Jorge Soares
29 May 2026, 20:19:35

É um excelente crossover...
Tem uma imagem desportiva e está bem equipado a nível de segurança e de tecnologia...
Tem uma óptima posição de condução...
É muito divertido de conduzir...
Só tenho pena de não trazer de fábrica o pneu sobresselente...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jorge Soares
26 Mar 2026, 01:31:22

Comprei há 2 meses o Seat Arona novo DE 95 cv... ´Trata-se da versão base...
Estou muito contente com o mesmo...
Tem um ótima posição elevada da condução, é económico, tem uma bagageira com uma boa capacidade de arrumação...
Considero que este B Suv tem uma aparência bem desportiva e atraente...
Só tenho pena deste carro não ter instalados de fábrica os faróis dianteiros de nevoeiro, nem a câmara de ré acho que isto faz muita falta a nível da segurança da condução... Só a versão superior do carro é que traz instalada isto tudo...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
SEAT Arona
VS
The Renault Captur and SEAT Arona are two of Europe’s most popular compact crossovers, each offering a city-friendly footprint with raised driving position and SUV styling. This short comparison focuses on practicality, driving character, running costs and feature value to help you pick the one …
SEAT Arona
VW Taigo
VS
The SEAT Arona is the zesty city crossover that trades bravado for practicality, while the VW Taigo dresses up the same bones with a sleeker, coupé-like roofline — pick Arona for everyday sense and Taigo if style tops your shopping list. Both share VW Group underpinnings and efficient engines, so …
Nissan Qashqai
SEAT Arona
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Qashqai and the SEAT Arona comes down to whether you want a more spacious, refined compact SUV (Qashqai) or a smaller, city‑friendly crossover that prioritises agility and value (Arona). I’ll run through the key differences in space, driving feel, engines, equipment and …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
SEAT Arona
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Think of the SEAT Arona as the chunky crossover that gives you a higher view of the road, more boot space and practical family-friendly packaging, while the SEAT Ibiza is the sharper, lighter hatch that’s more fun to hustle through town and returns better fuel economy. Pick the Arona if you want …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Fabia
VS
Choosing between the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Fabia means deciding if you prefer a compact crossover with higher ride height and SUV styling or a practical, roomy hatchback that maximises interior space and efficiency. I’ll compare driving feel, comfort, boot space, running costs and equipment to …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and the VW T-Cross are closely matched compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a touch of SUV style. This comparison focuses on space, fuel economy, driving feel, safety and running costs to help you decide which suits your …
Hyundai Kona
SEAT Arona
VS
The Hyundai Kona and SEAT Arona are two leading subcompact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV style and practicality without large running costs. The Kona stands out for its distinctive looks and tech-rich options, while the Arona focuses on straightforward value, practicality and efficient …
Ford Mustang Mach-E
SEAT Arona

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
20,700 - 30,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
120 - 132 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,188 - 1,268 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
502 - 522 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Ford
Brand
SEAT
What drivetrain options does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.