Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Connect vs KGM Rexton comparison
Compare performance (150 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (27,300 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or KGM Rexton?
Ford Tourneo Connect vs KGM Rexton: Key differences
Tourneo Connect
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Tourneo Connect is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the KGM Rexton costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,792 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the KGM Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 7.7 L/100km.
Rexton
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the KGM Rexton offers visibly more power – delivering 202 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Tourneo Connect is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 10.1 s, while the KGM Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Rexton delivers clearly more torque with 441 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 91 Nm more.
Tourneo Connect
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: KGM Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is noticeably lighter – 1,542 kg compared to 2,070 kg. The difference is around 528 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers substantially more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 784 L. That’s a difference of about 936 L.
When it comes to payload, the KGM Rexton carries marginally more – 845 kg compared to 818 kg. That’s a difference of about 27 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Connect is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,300
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Tourneo Connect
KGM Rexton
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
KGM Rexton
The Rexton is a roomy, rugged SUV that prioritizes comfort and practical utility, making it a sensible choice for families and buyers who need genuine off-road capability. It offers solid refinement and a generous equipment level for the money, though the brand still trails more mainstream rivals in recognition.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
KGM Rexton
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
Price
41,100 - 50,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.2 - 8.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
216 - 219 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,105 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
730 - 845 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
441 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
149 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
KGM
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.