Compare performance (150 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (27,300 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or Land Rover Range Rover?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Tourneo Connect is significantly cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 97,886 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers barely more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 3 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers substantially more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 400 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 5.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers considerably more torque with 800 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 450 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is clearly lighter – 1,542 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 962 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers clearly more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 818 L. That’s a difference of about 902 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries marginally more – 846 kg compared to 818 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.
The Ford Tourneo Connect stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
detailsThe Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
62 - 267 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
2,047 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
645 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plug-in Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|