Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport comparison
Compare performance (150 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (27,300 £ vs 80,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or Land Rover Range Rover Sport?
Tourneo Connect
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Tourneo Connect is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Sport costs 80,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 52,800 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport with 2.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 1 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Range Rover Sport
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport offers substantially more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 400 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 5.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Sport delivers considerably more torque with 800 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 450 Nm more.
Tourneo Connect
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is significantly lighter – 1,542 kg compared to 2,390 kg. The difference is around 848 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers substantially more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 647 L. That’s a difference of about 1,073 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport carries very slightly more – 830 kg compared to 818 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Connect is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,300
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Tourneo Connect
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
The Range Rover Sport pairs unapologetic presence with genuine capability, looking like it belongs on a red carpet while quietly promising to tackle rough tracks when called upon. Inside, the cabin pampers with plush materials and thoughtful tech, making it an irresistible choice for buyers who want luxury, confidence and a touch of adventure.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
Price
80,100 - 129,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
60 - 259 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
Curb weight
2,390 - 2,809 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
Trunk capacity
647 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
2,043 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
641 - 830 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plug-in Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
249 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
183 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.