Compare performance (150 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (27,300 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or Mazda CX-60?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Tourneo Connect is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,329 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers substantially more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 56 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers noticeably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is visibly lighter – 1,542 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 348 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers clearly more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 1,150 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries markedly more – 818 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 206 kg.
The Ford Tourneo Connect stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
detailsThe Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|