Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Peugeot 508 comparison
Compare performance (150 HP vs 360 HP), boot space and price (27,300 £ vs 44,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or Peugeot 508?
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Peugeot 508: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Tourneo Connect
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Tourneo Connect is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Peugeot 508 costs 44,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,229 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Peugeot 508 with 1.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers considerably more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 64 km more than the Peugeot 508.
508
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 508 offers substantially more power – delivering 360 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 210 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 508 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 4.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 508 delivers clearly more torque with 520 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm more.
Tourneo Connect
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is a bit lighter – 1,542 kg compared to 1,811 kg. The difference is around 269 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers clearly more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 487 L. That’s a difference of about 1,233 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries clearly more – 818 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 349 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Connect is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,300
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Tourneo Connect
Peugeot 508
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Peugeot 508
The Peugeot 508 turns heads with a low-slung, almost coupe-like silhouette and a cabin that feels grown-up and surprisingly premium for the money. On the road it balances comfort and poise with a playful edge, making it a convincing choice for buyers who want something stylish and sensible without shouting for attention.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
Peugeot 508
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
Price
44,600 - 60,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
46 - 55 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
36 - 45 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
Curb weight
1,811 - 1,941 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
Trunk capacity
487 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,750 mm
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,403 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,537 L
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
379 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
180 - 360 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
230 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 520 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
133 - 265 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.