Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Courier vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar comparison
Compare performance (136 HP vs 404 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 62,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Courier or Land Rover Range Rover Velar?
Ford Tourneo Courier vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Tourneo Courier
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Tourneo Courier is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 62,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,157 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Velar uses 4.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Tourneo Courier with 6.6 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers substantially more range – reaching up to 320 km, about 262 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
Range Rover Velar
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers substantially more power – delivering 404 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 268 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Velar delivers significantly more torque with 650 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 360 Nm more.
Tourneo Courier
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Courier is clearly lighter – 1,517 kg compared to 2,003 kg. The difference is around 486 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers very slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 552 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar carries slightly more – 587 kg compared to 483 kg. That’s a difference of about 104 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Courier is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £21,800
Ford Tourneo Courier
Ford Tourneo Courier
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Courier
The Ford Tourneo Courier is a cheeky, compact people carrier that turns urban errands into a pleasure, thanks to a spacious, cleverly packaged cabin and genuinely practical storage everywhere you look. It drives with reassuringly car-like manners, so the ride is comfy for school runs and shopping trips, and sensible touches like fold-flat seats, a high driving position and plentiful cubbies make it a smart, fuss-free choice for small families and weekend haulers.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.
details
Ford Tourneo Courier
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,800 - 35,000 £
|
Price
62,000 - 87,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 6.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 10 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
320 km
|
Electric Range
58 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
co2
103 - 228 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,517 - 1,545 kg
|
Curb weight
2,003 - 2,280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,800 - 1,813 mm
|
Width
1,933 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
480 - 483 kg
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 136 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
92 - 100 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 - 2,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C, F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.