Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Courier vs Mercedes EQT comparison
Compare performance (136 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Courier or Mercedes EQT?
Ford Tourneo Courier vs Mercedes EQT: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Tourneo Courier
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Tourneo Courier is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Mercedes EQT costs 27,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,960 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Tourneo Courier is barely more efficient: consuming 17.9 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers slightly more range – reaching up to 320 km, about 42 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
EQT
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers somewhat more power – delivering 136 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Tourneo Courier delivers moderately more torque with 290 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.
Tourneo Courier
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Courier is noticeably lighter – 1,517 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 408 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers very slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries only slightly more – 531 kg compared to 483 kg. That’s a difference of about 48 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Courier is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £21,800
Ford Tourneo Courier
Ford Tourneo Courier
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Courier
The Ford Tourneo Courier is a cheeky, compact people carrier that turns urban errands into a pleasure, thanks to a spacious, cleverly packaged cabin and genuinely practical storage everywhere you look. It drives with reassuringly car-like manners, so the ride is comfy for school runs and shopping trips, and sensible touches like fold-flat seats, a high driving position and plentiful cubbies make it a smart, fuss-free choice for small families and weekend haulers.
details
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Ford Tourneo Courier
Mercedes EQT
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,800 - 35,000 £
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 6.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
320 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,517 - 1,545 kg
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
1,800 - 1,813 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
|
Payload
480 - 483 kg
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 136 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 100 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.