Compare performance (136 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Courier or Suzuki Vitara?
In the diverse automotive universe, the Ford Tourneo Courier and Suzuki Vitara have carved niche spaces for themselves among family-friendly enthusiasts and adventure seekers. Both sporting 2024 models, they bring remarkable advances in technology and design. Let’s delve into how these two vehicles stack up against each other.
The Ford Tourneo Courier carries the DNA of practical high-roof wagons, standing tall with its 1817 mm height, and extending 4337 mm in length. This makes it a prime candidate for those who value spacious interiors without compromising on compact city navigation. A trunk capacity of 570 liters solidifies its stance as a practical choice for road trips.
In contrast, the Suzuki Vitara opts for a more traditional SUV design. With a length of 4185 mm, a width of 1775 mm, and a height of 1595 mm, it presents a more compact exterior yet a robust SUVs-like feel. While the trunk space is slightly smaller at 375-289 liters, the Vitara offers ample room for everyday essentials.
Under the hood, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers both petrol and electric options. The petrol engine boasts 125 HP, with a torque of 170 Nm, whereas the electric variant peaks with 136 HP and an impressive torque of 290 Nm. In terms of efficiency, the electric variant offers an exceptional range of 296 km thanks to its 43.5 kWh battery capacity.
The Suzuki Vitara, with its petrol MHEV and full hybrid engines, provides a delicately balanced approach between power and economy. Generating up to 129 HP and a solid torque of 235 Nm, the Vitara achieves a respectable acceleration from 0-100 km/h in as little as 9.5 seconds, all while maintaining a consumption range of 5-5.6 L/100km.
Both models showcase flexibility in transmission types. The Ford Tourneo Couriers come with options for both manual and automatic gearboxes, with classic front-wheel drive setup, appealing to drivers favoring simplicity and control.
Similarly, the Suzuki Vitara offers the choice between manual and automated manual transmission. Unique to the Vitara is the availability of all-wheel-drive, granting enthusiasts the capability to explore terrains beyond city limits.
With CO2 efficiency classes ranging from E to A, the Tourneo Courier emphasizes its commitment to environmental sustainability, an aspect complemented by its cutting-edge electric option. On the other hand, the Vitara’s lower CO2 emissions, ranging down to 113 g/km, underscore its competitive edge in sustainability among SUVs.
Both vehicles are designed with safety and functionality at their core, easily accommodating five passengers and ensuring comfort and space versatility for families.
The decision between the Ford Tourneo Courier and the Suzuki Vitara essentially boils down to the driver’s personal preference and lifestyle needs. The Tourneo Courier stands as an efficient, spacious, electric-friendly wagon for city and long-distance travel, while the Vitara remains a versatile and economic choice for those who may veer off the beaten path from time to time. Each vehicle captures the essence of its category, showcasing a blend of innovation and tradition.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Tourneo Courier is marginally cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Suzuki Vitara costs 23,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,757 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Vitara uses 5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Tourneo Courier with 6.6 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Suzuki Vitara is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 17.3 kWh/100km for the Ford Tourneo Courier. That’s a difference of about 2.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers clearly more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 138 km more than the Ford Tourneo Courier.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers clearly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers very slightly more torque with 307 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 17 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is markedly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,517 kg. The difference is around 262 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers markedly more boot space – 570 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 195 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Courier carries moderately more – 483 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 58 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Tourneo Courier is a cheeky, compact people carrier that turns urban errands into a pleasure, thanks to a spacious, cleverly packaged cabin and genuinely practical storage everywhere you look. It drives with reassuringly car-like manners, so the ride is comfy for school runs and shopping trips, and sensible touches like fold-flat seats, a high driving position and plentiful cubbies make it a smart, fuss-free choice for small families and weekend haulers.
details
The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,800 - 34,300 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 6.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
288 km
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,517 - 1,545 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,185 mm
|
|
Width
1,800 - 1,813 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,046 - 1,120 L
|
|
Payload
480 - 483 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 136 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 12.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 100 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 - 1,462 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España