Compare performance (168 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Suzuki Vitara?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As more drivers seek to combine the practicality of an SUV with cutting-edge technology, two contenders stand out in the current market: the Ford Puma and the Suzuki Vitara. Both models are robust in their own rights but cater to slightly different tastes and needs. Let’s delve into the details and see how these two modern SUVs stack up.
When it comes to powertrains, the Ford Puma offers a diverse lineup, including options for a Petrol MHEV and an Electric engine. With horsepower ranging from 125 HP to a punchy 168 HP, it boasts a dynamic driving experience, offering both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions. The Puma also features front-wheel drive, enhancing its maneuverability in city environments.
Conversely, the Suzuki Vitara relies on a similarly varied powertrains, including Petrol MHEV and full hybrid options. It delivers horsepower ranging from 116 HP to 129 HP, targeting those who value efficiency and reduced emissions. Notably, the Vitara provides an all-wheel-drive option, granting it an edge for those living in areas prone to challenging terrains.
The Ford Puma's lineup with its mild hybrid engines achieves a consumption rate as low as 5.4 L/100km for petrol, while their electric model achieves a consumption between 13.1 and 13.7 kWh/100km. The electric variant stands out, offering an impressive range of up to 376 km, appealing to eco-friendly drivers. With CO2 emissions from as low as 0 g/km on its electric model, the Puma assures high environmental efficiency.
The Suzuki Vitara, with its hybrid variants, offers a competitive fuel consumption rate, with figures from 5 L/100km, making it highly nuanced among eco-conscious drivers. It combines this with CO2 emissions from 113 g/km upwards, allowing drivers to benefit from a balance between power and efficiency.
In terms of space, the Ford Puma sports a trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, which is notably spacious for storage. This, combined with its dimensions, including a length up to 4226 mm and a width of 1805 mm, ensures a commendable cabin space for passengers.
The Suzuki Vitara, while slightly more compact with a length of 4185 mm and width of 1775 mm, offers somewhat smaller trunk capacities between 289 and 375 liters. However, it compensates with a higher stance at 1595 mm, delivering an impressive presence on the road.
Ford emphasizes its technological advancements within the Puma, equipping it with smart features that prioritize safety and connectivity. Its MyKey system and enhanced driver assistance technologies bolster driver confidence.
The Suzuki Vitara also doesn’t lag far behind, offering a suite of driver assistance features and advanced security systems that bolster its reputation as a reliable SUV for families.
The Ford Puma and Suzuki Vitara serve different segments within the SUV sphere. The Puma is tailored for those prioritizing a dynamic drive with the added option of electric efficiency. Meanwhile, the Vitara proves ideal for drivers needing versatility and robustness, particularly with its all-wheel-drive option.
Choosing between them will mainly depend on whether your priority is cutting-edge technology and eco-friendly driving or versatile, rugged performance in diverse environments. Ultimately, both models symbolize the modern-day SUV's innovative spirit but encapsulate distinct aspects of it.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Suzuki Vitara is very slightly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 343 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Vitara uses 5.3 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is moderately more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Suzuki Vitara. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers barely more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 9 km more than the Ford Puma.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara offers very slightly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.4 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers barely more torque with 307 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 17 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is barely lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 61 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 148 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries barely more – 469 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España