@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
VS

Ford Puma vs Suzuki Vitara – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Puma or Suzuki Vitara?

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

A Modern Duel: Ford Puma vs. Suzuki Vitara

As more drivers seek to combine the practicality of an SUV with cutting-edge technology, two contenders stand out in the current market: the Ford Puma and the Suzuki Vitara. Both models are robust in their own rights but cater to slightly different tastes and needs. Let’s delve into the details and see how these two modern SUVs stack up.

Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Performance and Power

When it comes to powertrains, the Ford Puma offers a diverse lineup, including options for a Petrol MHEV and an Electric engine. With horsepower ranging from 125 HP to a punchy 168 HP, it boasts a dynamic driving experience, offering both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions. The Puma also features front-wheel drive, enhancing its maneuverability in city environments.

Conversely, the Suzuki Vitara relies on a similarly varied powertrains, including Petrol MHEV and full hybrid options. It delivers horsepower ranging from 116 HP to 129 HP, targeting those who value efficiency and reduced emissions. Notably, the Vitara provides an all-wheel-drive option, granting it an edge for those living in areas prone to challenging terrains.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

The Ford Puma's lineup with its mild hybrid engines achieves a consumption rate as low as 5.4 L/100km for petrol, while their electric model achieves a consumption between 13.1 and 13.7 kWh/100km. The electric variant stands out, offering an impressive range of up to 376 km, appealing to eco-friendly drivers. With CO2 emissions from as low as 0 g/km on its electric model, the Puma assures high environmental efficiency.

The Suzuki Vitara, with its hybrid variants, offers a competitive fuel consumption rate, with figures from 5 L/100km, making it highly nuanced among eco-conscious drivers. It combines this with CO2 emissions from 113 g/km upwards, allowing drivers to benefit from a balance between power and efficiency.

Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Dimensions and Capacities

In terms of space, the Ford Puma sports a trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, which is notably spacious for storage. This, combined with its dimensions, including a length up to 4226 mm and a width of 1805 mm, ensures a commendable cabin space for passengers.

The Suzuki Vitara, while slightly more compact with a length of 4185 mm and width of 1775 mm, offers somewhat smaller trunk capacities between 289 and 375 liters. However, it compensates with a higher stance at 1595 mm, delivering an impressive presence on the road.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Safety and Technology

Ford emphasizes its technological advancements within the Puma, equipping it with smart features that prioritize safety and connectivity. Its MyKey system and enhanced driver assistance technologies bolster driver confidence.

The Suzuki Vitara also doesn’t lag far behind, offering a suite of driver assistance features and advanced security systems that bolster its reputation as a reliable SUV for families.

Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Driving the Decision

The Ford Puma and Suzuki Vitara serve different segments within the SUV sphere. The Puma is tailored for those prioritizing a dynamic drive with the added option of electric efficiency. Meanwhile, the Vitara proves ideal for drivers needing versatility and robustness, particularly with its all-wheel-drive option.

Choosing between them will mainly depend on whether your priority is cutting-edge technology and eco-friendly driving or versatile, rugged performance in diverse environments. Ultimately, both models symbolize the modern-day SUV's innovative spirit but encapsulate distinct aspects of it.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki Vitara has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23600 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 1200 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Vitara manages with 5 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.

Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 168 HP compared to 129 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 9.50 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is minimal lighter – 1255 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 61 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers evident more room – 523 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 148 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – up to 1283 L, which is about 163 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma somewhat takes the win – 469 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Ford Puma shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £24,800
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.1 - 13.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 361 - 376 km

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Suzuki Vitara

5 (1)
rate

The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.

details
Ford Puma
Suzuki Vitara
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Vitara @ Suzuki Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
23600 - 30900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
113 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1255 - 1395 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4185 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1775 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1595 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1046 - 1120 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
375 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
110 - 129 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 12.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
81 - 95 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Suzuki
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.