Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Suzuki Vitara - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 129 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 23600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Suzuki Vitara?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Suzuki Vitara has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23600 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1200 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Vitara manages with 5 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
Vitara
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 168 HP compared to 129 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 9.50 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is minimal lighter – 1255 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 61 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers evident more room – 523 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 148 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – up to 1283 L, which is about 163 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma somewhat takes the win – 469 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Suzuki Vitara
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Ford Puma
Suzuki Vitara
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
23600 - 30900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
113 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1255 - 1395 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4185 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1775 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1046 - 1120 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
375 - 400 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 129 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 12.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 95 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.