Compare performance (168 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 23600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Suzuki Vitara?
As more drivers seek to combine the practicality of an SUV with cutting-edge technology, two contenders stand out in the current market: the Ford Puma and the Suzuki Vitara. Both models are robust in their own rights but cater to slightly different tastes and needs. Let’s delve into the details and see how these two modern SUVs stack up.
When it comes to powertrains, the Ford Puma offers a diverse lineup, including options for a Petrol MHEV and an Electric engine. With horsepower ranging from 125 HP to a punchy 168 HP, it boasts a dynamic driving experience, offering both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions. The Puma also features front-wheel drive, enhancing its maneuverability in city environments.
Conversely, the Suzuki Vitara relies on a similarly varied powertrains, including Petrol MHEV and full hybrid options. It delivers horsepower ranging from 116 HP to 129 HP, targeting those who value efficiency and reduced emissions. Notably, the Vitara provides an all-wheel-drive option, granting it an edge for those living in areas prone to challenging terrains.
The Ford Puma's lineup with its mild hybrid engines achieves a consumption rate as low as 5.4 L/100km for petrol, while their electric model achieves a consumption between 13.1 and 13.7 kWh/100km. The electric variant stands out, offering an impressive range of up to 376 km, appealing to eco-friendly drivers. With CO2 emissions from as low as 0 g/km on its electric model, the Puma assures high environmental efficiency.
The Suzuki Vitara, with its hybrid variants, offers a competitive fuel consumption rate, with figures from 5 L/100km, making it highly nuanced among eco-conscious drivers. It combines this with CO2 emissions from 113 g/km upwards, allowing drivers to benefit from a balance between power and efficiency.
In terms of space, the Ford Puma sports a trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, which is notably spacious for storage. This, combined with its dimensions, including a length up to 4226 mm and a width of 1805 mm, ensures a commendable cabin space for passengers.
The Suzuki Vitara, while slightly more compact with a length of 4185 mm and width of 1775 mm, offers somewhat smaller trunk capacities between 289 and 375 liters. However, it compensates with a higher stance at 1595 mm, delivering an impressive presence on the road.
Ford emphasizes its technological advancements within the Puma, equipping it with smart features that prioritize safety and connectivity. Its MyKey system and enhanced driver assistance technologies bolster driver confidence.
The Suzuki Vitara also doesn’t lag far behind, offering a suite of driver assistance features and advanced security systems that bolster its reputation as a reliable SUV for families.
The Ford Puma and Suzuki Vitara serve different segments within the SUV sphere. The Puma is tailored for those prioritizing a dynamic drive with the added option of electric efficiency. Meanwhile, the Vitara proves ideal for drivers needing versatility and robustness, particularly with its all-wheel-drive option.
Choosing between them will mainly depend on whether your priority is cutting-edge technology and eco-friendly driving or versatile, rugged performance in diverse environments. Ultimately, both models symbolize the modern-day SUV's innovative spirit but encapsulate distinct aspects of it.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Suzuki Vitara has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23600 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1200 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Vitara manages with 5 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 14.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara performs a bit better – achieving up to 426 km, about 50 km more than the Ford Puma.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Vitara has a slight edge – offering 184 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 16 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.40 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs minimal better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Suzuki Vitara tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Suzuki Vitara pulls barely noticeable stronger with 307 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 17 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is minimal lighter – 1255 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 61 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers evident more room – 523 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 148 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – up to 1283 L, which is about 163 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma minimal takes the win – 469 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 44 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
23600 - 36800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1255 - 1935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4185 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1775 - 1800 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1595 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1046 - 1120 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 12.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España
