Compare performance (286 HP vs 131 HP), boot space and price (45,700 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Custom or Mercedes Citan?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes Citan is significantly cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Ford Tourneo Custom costs 45,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,304 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Custom uses 4.1 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mercedes Citan with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes Citan is clearly more efficient: consuming 19.3 kWh/100km compared to 24.1 kWh/100km for the Ford Tourneo Custom. That’s a difference of about 4.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Custom offers a bit more range – reaching up to 339 km, about 59 km more than the Mercedes Citan.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Tourneo Custom offers considerably more power – delivering 286 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 155 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Tourneo Custom delivers substantially more torque with 630 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 360 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Tourneo Custom offers more seats – 8 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Citan is clearly lighter – 1,556 kg compared to 2,453 kg. The difference is around 897 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Custom offers noticeably more boot space – 819 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 268 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Citan offers clearly more capacity – up to 3,660 L, about 2,306 L more than the Ford Tourneo Custom.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Custom carries noticeably more – 847 kg compared to 644 kg. That’s a difference of about 203 kg.
The Ford Tourneo Custom shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Tourneo Custom is a practical and polished people‑carrier that turns hauling crew and weekend kit into something surprisingly pleasant, with a composed ride and a cabin built for real life rather than showroom gloss. With clever storage, flexible seating and tech that keeps everyone happy on the road, it’s the sensible choice for families or businesses that want function without sacrificing a bit of style — the van that learnt how to be nice to live with.
detailsThe Mercedes Citan is a clever urban van that dresses sensible practicality in a surprisingly premium suit, making light work of deliveries and family duties without feeling like a workhorse. With a calm, car-like driving feel, clever interior packaging and the Mercedes badge up front, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want function with a touch of luxury and a wink of personality.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,700 - 69,700 £
|
Price
22,400 - 30,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24.1 - 26.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
49 - 339 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 280 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.8 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 226 g/km
|
co2
0 - 167 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 63 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
8
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,453 - 2,707 kg
|
Curb weight
1,556 - 2,010 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
672 - 819 L
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 551 L
|
|
Length
5,050 - 5,450 mm
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
1,958 - 1,959 mm
|
Height
1,811 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,045 - 1,354 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 - 3,660 L
|
|
Payload
620 - 847 kg
|
Payload
485 - 644 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 286 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13 - 15.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
|
Torque
360 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 210 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B, C, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|