VS

Ford Transit Bus vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (50,500 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Bus or Land Rover Range Rover?

Ford Transit Bus vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences

Ford Transit Bus

  • clearly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

Land Rover Range Rover

3.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Bus

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Transit Bus is clearly cheaper – starting at 50,500 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 74,728 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Transit Bus with 9.4 L/100km. The difference is about 6.6 L/100km.

Range Rover

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers significantly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 400 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers significantly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 410 Nm more.

Transit Bus

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Ford Transit Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 7.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Bus is marginally lighter – 2,338 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 166 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers substantially more boot space – 818 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 818 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Bus carries clearly more – 1,162 kg compared to 846 kg. That’s a difference of about 316 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £125,200
Range Rover

Land Rover Range Rover

  • Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 300 - 550 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 115 - 116 km
Ford Transit Bus
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Bus

The Ford Transit is the reliable people-mover operators turn to when they need space, stamina and sensible running costs without fuss. It doesn't try to be glamorous, but its practical interior, flexible layouts and honest character make it a smart, stress-free choice for shuttle services and group transport.

details

Land Rover Range Rover

The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.

details
Ford Transit Bus
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption

Price
50,500 - 52,900 £
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
Consumption L/100km
9.4 - 9.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
245 - 248 g/km
co2
62 - 267 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Bus
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
9
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,338 - 2,385 kg
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
Trunk capacity
0 L
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
Length
5,531 - 5,981 mm
Length
-
Width
2,059 mm
Width
2,047 mm
Height
2,530 - 2,533 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
1,115 - 1,162 kg
Payload
645 - 846 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 - 150 HP
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
96 - 110 kW
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Land Rover
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.