Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Land Rover Range Rover - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (292 HP vs 615 HP), boot space and price (37500 £ vs 122700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Land Rover Range Rover?
Ranger
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Ranger has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 37500 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 122700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 85217 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover manages with 2.70 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Ford Ranger with 3.10 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover performs clearly better – achieving up to 117 km, about 75 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover has a clearly edge – offering 615 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 323 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.50 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 7.90 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover performs distinct better – reaching 261 km/h, while the Ford Ranger tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 71 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover pulls somewhat stronger with 800 Nm compared to 697 Nm. That’s about 103 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Ranger
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Ford Ranger is evident lighter – 2082 kg compared to 2504 kg. The difference is around 422 kg.
When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger noticeable takes the win – 1108 kg compared to 846 kg. That’s a difference of about 262 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £122,700
Land Rover Range Rover
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37500 - 71900 £
|
Price
122700 - 244700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 117 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
31.80 kWh
|
|
co2
70 - 315 g/km
|
co2
62 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 - 90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
2 - 4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2082 - 2511 kg
|
Curb weight
2504 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
5370 - 5420 mm
|
Length
5052 - 5258 mm
|
|
Width
1918 - 1968 mm
|
Width
2047 mm
|
|
Height
1868 - 1922 mm
|
Height
1870 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1841 - 2176 L
|
|
Payload
676 - 1108 kg
|
Payload
589 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 615 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 12.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
218 - 261 km/h
|
|
Torque
405 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
650 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
125 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 452 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 - 2993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the Ford Ranger?
The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.