Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Nissan X-Trail – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Nissan X-Trail?
Ranger
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan X-Trail has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34000 £, while the Ford Ranger costs 37500 £. That’s a price difference of around 3497 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Ranger manages with 3.10 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.70 L. The difference is about 2.60 L per 100 km.
X-Trail
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger has a evident edge – offering 292 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 79 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan X-Trail is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 7.90 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Nissan X-Trail performs minimal better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Ford Ranger tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Ranger pulls noticeable stronger with 697 Nm compared to 525 Nm. That’s about 172 Nm difference.
Ranger
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is noticeable lighter – 1668 kg compared to 2082 kg. The difference is around 414 kg.
When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger clearly takes the win – 1108 kg compared to 574 kg. That’s a difference of about 534 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Ranger proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Ranger is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £37,500
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Ranger
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger stands out in the pickup market with its robust build and versatile capabilities, making it a popular choice for both work and leisure. Its modern design is complemented by a well-equipped interior, providing comfort and advanced technology. Whether tackling challenging terrains or cruising through the city, the Ranger delivers a reliable and dynamic driving experience.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Nissan X-Trail
The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Ford Ranger
Nissan X-Trail
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37500 - 71900 £
|
Price
34000 - 50400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 315 g/km
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
2 - 4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2082 - 2511 kg
|
Curb weight
1668 - 1961 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
|
Length
5370 - 5420 mm
|
Length
4680 mm
|
|
Width
1918 - 1968 mm
|
Width
1840 mm
|
|
Height
1868 - 1922 mm
|
Height
1720 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1396 - 1424 L
|
|
Payload
676 - 1108 kg
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 12.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
405 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
125 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 - 2993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1497 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|
What drive types are available for the Ford Ranger?
The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.