Compare performance (150 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (50,500 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Bus or Mazda MX-30?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda MX-30 is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Ford Transit Bus costs 50,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,652 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 offers moderately more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-30 is visibly lighter – 1,849 kg compared to 2,338 kg. The difference is around 489 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda MX-30 offers considerably more boot space – 350 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 350 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Bus carries considerably more – 1,162 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 760 kg.
The Mazda MX-30 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the reliable people-mover operators turn to when they need space, stamina and sensible running costs without fuss. It doesn't try to be glamorous, but its practical interior, flexible layouts and honest character make it a smart, stress-free choice for shuttle services and group transport.
detailsThe Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,500 - 52,900 £
|
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
9.4 - 9.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
245 - 248 g/km
|
co2
22 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,338 - 2,385 kg
|
Curb weight
1,849 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
|
|
Length
5,531 - 5,981 mm
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,533 mm
|
Height
1,555 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
|
|
Payload
1,115 - 1,162 kg
|
Payload
402 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
|
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
96 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
830 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|