Compare performance (150 HP vs 435 HP), boot space and price (50,500 £ vs 54,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Bus or Nissan Ariya?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Transit Bus is barely cheaper – starting at 50,500 £ , while the Nissan Ariya costs 54,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,348 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Ariya offers considerably more power – delivering 435 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 285 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Ariya delivers clearly more torque with 600 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Transit Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Ariya is only slightly lighter – 2,277 kg compared to 2,338 kg. The difference is around 61 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Ariya offers considerably more boot space – 415 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 415 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Bus carries clearly more – 1,162 kg compared to 363 kg. That’s a difference of about 799 kg.
The Nissan Ariya holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the reliable people-mover operators turn to when they need space, stamina and sensible running costs without fuss. It doesn't try to be glamorous, but its practical interior, flexible layouts and honest character make it a smart, stress-free choice for shuttle services and group transport.
detailsThe Nissan Ariya wraps futuristic, sculpted styling around a calm, high-tech cabin, making the switch to electric feel surprisingly easy and grown-up. It’s a comfortable, sensible EV that favors everyday usability and clever packaging over headline-grabbing theatrics — ideal for buyers who want an elegant, low-fuss electric car without the ego.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,500 - 52,900 £
|
Price
54,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
9.4 - 9.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
245 - 248 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,338 - 2,385 kg
|
Curb weight
2,277 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
Trunk capacity
415 L
|
|
Length
5,531 - 5,981 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,533 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
1,115 - 1,162 kg
|
Payload
363 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
435 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
|
Torque
600 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
96 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
320 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|