Compare performance (122 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 38,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Connect or Mazda 6 Saloon?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Transit Connect is markedly cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Mazda 6 Saloon costs 38,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,681 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 6 Saloon offers significantly more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 6 Saloon is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Ford Transit Connect takes 11.4 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 320 Nm.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda 6 Saloon offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is noticeably lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 2,027 kg. The difference is around 452 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Connect carries significantly more – 780 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 420 kg.
The Mazda 6 Saloon is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsThe Mazda6 saloon feels like the sensible yet stylish choice for buyers who want a car that drives with poise and looks sharper than its badge suggests. It mixes engaging handling, a refined cabin and everyday practicality without shouting for attention — perfect for those who prefer understated class with a wink.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
|
Price
38,500 - 41,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
479 - 552 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
-
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
|
Curb weight
2,027 - 2,028 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
336 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,921 mm
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,491 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,074 L
|
|
Payload
775 - 780 kg
|
Payload
359 - 360 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
245 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
175 km/h
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
180 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|