VS

Ford Transit Connect vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Connect or Mazda CX-5?

Ford Transit Connect vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Ford Transit Connect

  • very slightly lighter
details

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Connect

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-5 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 813 £.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-5 offers a bit more power – delivering 141 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 19 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-5 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 10.5 s, while the Ford Transit Connect takes 11.4 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers noticeably more torque with 320 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 82 Nm more.

Transit Connect

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-5 offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is very slightly lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Connect carries noticeably more – 780 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 179 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-5 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
CX-5

Mazda CX-5

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 141 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
Ford Transit Connect
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Connect

The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.

details
98B296E7-C10F-4999-B4D2-428B46A9DF09
2018_FORD_TRANSIT_Kombi__18
2018_FORD_TRANSIT__12

Reviews Ford Transit Connect

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ghighi
26 Jul 2026, 15:53:31

Mazda is much better designed. Audis are pretty ugly overall, especially the "Q" series.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Kia Sportage
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Kia Sportage and Mazda CX-5 stand out with their distinct design philosophies and driving dynamics. While the Sportage offers a spacious interior and an array of advanced tech features, the CX-5 is celebrated for its engaging handling and upscale cabin …
Ford Transit Connect
VW Caddy
VS
The Ford Transit Connect and the VW Caddy are two of the most popular compact vans for small businesses and urban operators, offering a practical mix of cargo space, fuel economy and maneuverability. Choose the Transit Connect if you want slightly more load flexibility and car-like driving …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-5
VS
Comparing the Jaguar F‑Pace and the Mazda CX‑5 pits a sporty, luxury-oriented midsize SUV against a sharply styled, value-focused compact crossover — a matchup of premium feel and driving dynamics versus everyday practicality and efficiency. Choose the F‑Pace if you prioritize performance, brand …
Mazda CX-5
SEAT Ateca
VS
Mazda CX-5 and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the SEAT Ateca …
Ford Transit Connect
Ford Transit Courier
VS
In the world of compact commercial vehicles, the Ford Transit Connect and Ford Transit Courier each offer unique advantages tailored to different business needs. The Transit Connect boasts a larger cargo capacity and a more powerful engine lineup, making it ideal for those requiring additional …
Ford Transit Connect
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,855 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
775 - 780 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
320 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
90 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Ford Transit Connect?

The Ford Transit Connect is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.