Compare performance (122 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Connect or Mercedes EQT?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes EQT is moderately cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,030 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
Both models deliver identical power – 122 HP each.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Transit Connect is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 11.4 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers markedly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 75 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mercedes EQT offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is visibly lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 350 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Connect carries visibly more – 780 kg compared to 531 kg. That’s a difference of about 249 kg.
The Ford Transit Connect is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsThe Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
-
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
|
Payload
775 - 780 kg
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|