Compare performance (122 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 29,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Connect or Nissan Townstar Compact Van?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Townstar Compact Van is marginally cheaper – starting at 29,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,347 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Townstar Compact Van offers marginally more power – delivering 130 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers visibly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 75 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Nissan Townstar Compact Van offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Townstar Compact Van is moderately lighter – 1,399 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 176 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Connect carries barely more – 780 kg compared to 775 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
The Nissan Townstar Compact Van has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsThe Nissan Townstar is a smart, no-nonsense compact van that makes city running and tight deliveries feel almost effortless thanks to tidy packaging and clever storage. It keeps things sensible on the wallet and the road, offering a comfortable driving position and useful tech without flashy frills — the kind of workhorse you'll actually enjoy parking at the kerb.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
|
Price
29,500 - 37,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
263 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
-
|
co2
0 - 155 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
|
Curb weight
1,399 - 1,908 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
775 - 780 kg
|
Payload
571 - 775 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|