Compare performance (122 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Connect or smart #3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Transit Connect is noticeably cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the smart #3 costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,187 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers significantly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Ford Transit Connect takes 11.4 s. That’s about 5.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #3 delivers a bit more torque with 384 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 64 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: smart #3 offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is somewhat lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 235 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Connect carries substantially more – 780 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 330 kg.
The smart #3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsThe Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
|
Price
42,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
-
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,844 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
775 - 780 kg
|
Payload
450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
Torque
384 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
smart
|