Compare performance (286 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (49,700 £ vs 50,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Transporter or Mercedes EQV?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Transit Custom Transporter is only slightly cheaper – starting at 49,700 £ , while the Mercedes EQV costs 50,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,073 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers clearly more power – delivering 286 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 82 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Transporter delivers considerably more torque with 630 Nm compared to 365 Nm. That’s about 265 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
The Ford Transit Custom Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Transit Custom is a clever, no-nonsense workhorse that blends roomy practicality with surprisingly car-like driving manners, so your workday feels less like a chore and more like efficient transport. With a sensible interior, smart storage and tidy handling, it’s the kind of van that makes owners smile while they get on with the job — reliable, unfussy and built to keep moving.
detailsThe Mercedes EQV is a serene electric people‑mover that wraps practical interior space in true Mercedes luxury, turning long trips into a first‑class commute. It’s perfect for families and executives who want silent, comfortable transport with a premium feel, and it manages to be both sensible and a little bit smug in the best possible way.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,700 - 77,400 £
|
Price
50,700 - 54,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
27.1 - 27.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
244 - 364 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,666 - 2,863 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
1,030 - 1,410 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,140 - 5,370 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,920 - 1,923 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
4,630 - 5,010 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
637 - 834 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 286 HP
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.3 - 12.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
365 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
100 - 210 kW
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|