Compare performance (286 HP vs 653 HP), boot space and price (49,700 £ vs 71,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Transporter or NIO EL8?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Transit Custom Transporter is clearly cheaper – starting at 49,700 £ , while the NIO EL8 costs 71,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,383 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO EL8 offers significantly more power – delivering 653 HP compared to 286 HP. That’s roughly 367 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO EL8 delivers visibly more torque with 850 Nm compared to 630 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
The NIO EL8 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Transit Custom is a clever, no-nonsense workhorse that blends roomy practicality with surprisingly car-like driving manners, so your workday feels less like a chore and more like efficient transport. With a sensible interior, smart storage and tidy handling, it’s the kind of van that makes owners smile while they get on with the job — reliable, unfussy and built to keep moving.
detailsThe NIO EL8 feels like a tech-savvy living room on wheels, blending upscale comfort with playful design for buyers who want electric refinement without the clinical vibe. It’s roomy, packed with clever features and a relaxed driving character that turns everyday trips into something a little more fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,700 - 77,400 £
|
Price
71,100 - 90,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
390 - 510 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,613 - 2,633 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
265 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,099 mm
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,989 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,750 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
810 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
557 - 577 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 286 HP
|
Power HP
653 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
850 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
100 - 210 kW
|
Power kW
480 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
NIO
|