Compare performance (269 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Land Rover Range Rover?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Transit Transporter is significantly cheaper – starting at 67,300 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 57,919 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers considerably more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 286 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers significantly more power – delivering 550 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 281 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers substantially more torque with 800 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 370 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 6.
The Ford Transit Transporter stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
62 - 267 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
2,047 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
645 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Land Rover
|