Compare performance (269 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Mazda 6 Estate?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda 6 Estate is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 37,309 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers markedly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 75 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers markedly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 258 Nm. That’s about 172 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mazda 6 Estate marries elegant, flowing design with everyday practicality, so you get a grown-up wagon that still looks the part on a weekend escape. It rewards drivers with poised handling and a nicely finished cabin, proving that sensible family cars can be engaging — and a little bit cheeky — too.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
30,000 - 43,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
155 - 172 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,475 - 1,598 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
522 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,805 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,480 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,664 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
483 - 571 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 194 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
205 - 223 km/h
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
213 - 258 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 143 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|