Compare performance (269 HP vs 585 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 80,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Mercedes EQS?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Transit Transporter is markedly cheaper – starting at 67,300 £ , while the Mercedes EQS costs 80,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,607 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS offers considerably more range – reaching up to 920 km, about 518 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS offers clearly more power – delivering 585 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 316 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS delivers clearly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 370 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Mercedes EQS is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mercedes EQS is a silent, spaceship-like flagship that turns electric luxury into zen on wheels, wrapped in a swooping design that insists on being admired. Inside it’s all glassy screens and soft-touch surfaces that make long trips feel like first class, and the driving experience is composed and effortless — like a courteous butler with an electric heart.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
80,900 - 117,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
810 - 920 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,550 - 2,660 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
610 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,926 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
545 - 570 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
367 - 585 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
505 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
270 - 430 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|