Compare performance (269 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Mercedes EQT?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes EQT is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 39,535 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers clearly more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 124 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers significantly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers significantly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 185 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|