Compare performance (269 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 31,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Toyota Proace Transporter?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota Proace Transporter is substantially cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 35,674 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers a bit more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 53 km more than the Toyota Proace Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers considerably more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 119 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers slightly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 370 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
The Ford Transit Transporter is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Toyota Proace Transporter is a no-nonsense work van that pairs Toyota’s dependable reputation with smart practicality, so you can load, drive and finish the job without unnecessary drama. It won’t win design awards, but with a comfortable cab, sensible feature set and a focus on getting things done, it quietly keeps fleets and small businesses smiling.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
31,600 - 51,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
349 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,656 - 2,100 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
955 - 1,323 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
120 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
88 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, A, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|