Compare performance (269 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (39,900 £ vs 31,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Toyota Proace Transporter?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota Proace Transporter is markedly cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,298 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Proace Transporter uses 6.4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Transit Transporter is moderately more efficient: consuming 21.3 kWh/100km compared to 23.8 kWh/100km for the Toyota Proace Transporter. That’s a difference of about 2.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers a bit more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 53 km more than the Toyota Proace Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers considerably more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 119 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Toyota Proace Transporter is very slightly faster – reaching 130 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers slightly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 370 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Proace Transporter is clearly lighter – 1,656 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 418 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter offers considerably more capacity – up to 14,100 L, about 7,500 L more than the Toyota Proace Transporter.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Transporter carries considerably more – 2,607 kg compared to 1,323 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,284 kg.
The Ford Transit Transporter is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Toyota Proace Transporter is a no-nonsense work van that pairs Toyota’s dependable reputation with smart practicality, so you can load, drive and finish the job without unnecessary drama. It won’t win design awards, but with a comfortable cab, sensible feature set and a focus on getting things done, it quietly keeps fleets and small businesses smiling.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,900 - 73,000 £
|
Price
31,600 - 51,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
247 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
221 - 349 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,765 kg
|
Curb weight
1,656 - 2,100 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5,531 - 6,704 mm
|
Length
4,980 - 5,330 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,778 mm
|
Height
1,895 - 1,935 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
9,300 - 14,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
5,300 - 6,600 L
|
|
Payload
735 - 2,607 kg
|
Payload
955 - 1,323 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
120 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
Max Speed
130 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
88 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,019 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|