Compare performance (269 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 50,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Mercedes EQV?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes EQV is visibly cheaper – starting at 50,700 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,562 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 38 km more than the Mercedes EQV.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers visibly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 65 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers slightly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 365 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
The Ford Transit Transporter holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mercedes EQV is a serene electric people‑mover that wraps practical interior space in true Mercedes luxury, turning long trips into a first‑class commute. It’s perfect for families and executives who want silent, comfortable transport with a premium feel, and it manages to be both sensible and a little bit smug in the best possible way.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
50,700 - 54,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
27.1 - 27.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
244 - 364 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,666 - 2,863 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
1,030 - 1,410 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,140 - 5,370 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,920 - 1,923 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
4,630 - 5,010 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
637 - 834 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.3 - 12.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
365 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|