VS

Ford Transit Transporter vs Nissan Interstar - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (269 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (39900 £ vs 34900 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Nissan Interstar?

Ford Transit Transporter

Nissan Interstar

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Interstar has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34900 £, while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39900 £. That’s a price difference of around 4998 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Nissan Interstar manages with 7.40 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.90 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Nissan Interstar performs noticeable better – achieving up to 410 km, about 93 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.

Transit Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter has a distinct edge – offering 269 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 99 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Nissan Interstar performs evident better – reaching 177 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 57 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Transit Transporter pulls a bit stronger with 430 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.

Transit Transporter

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Nissan Interstar offers somewhat more seating capacity – 7 vs 6.

In curb weight, Nissan Interstar is minimal lighter – 2053 kg compared to 2074 kg. The difference is around 21 kg.

In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Interstar performs minimal better – up to 14800 L, which is about 700 L more than the Ford Transit Transporter.

When it comes to payload, Ford Transit Transporter convincingly takes the win – 2607 kg compared to 1447 kg. That’s a difference of about 1160 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Ford Transit Transporter shows itself to be wins by a narrow margin and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £39,900
Transit Transporter

Ford Transit Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 105 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7.9 - 10.3 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 21.3 - 32 kWh
  • Electric Range : 247 - 317 km
Ford Transit Transporter
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Transporter

The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.

details

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
Ford Transit Transporter
Nissan Interstar
Transit Transporter

Costs and Consumption

Price
39900 - 69100 £
Price
34900 - 55700 £
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
247 - 317 km
Electric Range
175 - 410 km
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 270 g/km
co2
0 - 195 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
80 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
3 - 7
Doors
4
Doors
4
Curb weight
2074 - 2765 kg
Curb weight
2053 - 2535 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
5531 - 6704 mm
Length
5680 - 6315 mm
Width
2059 mm
Width
2080 mm
Height
2530 - 2778 mm
Height
2498 - 2756 mm
Max trunk capacity
9300 - 14100 L
Max trunk capacity
5200 - 14800 L
Payload
735 - 2607 kg
Payload
965 - 1447 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
Power HP
105 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
120 km/h
Max Speed
115 - 177 km/h
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
Power kW
77 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
1996 cm3
Engine capacity
1997 cm3

General

Model Year
2019 - 2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the Ford Transit Transporter have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.