Compare performance (269 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (39,900 £ vs 34,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Nissan Interstar?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Interstar is somewhat cheaper – starting at 34,900 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,998 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Interstar uses 7.4 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers marginally more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 8 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers visibly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 99 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Nissan Interstar is clearly faster – reaching 177 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 57 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers moderately more torque with 430 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Nissan Interstar offers more seats – 7 vs 6.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Interstar is marginally lighter – 2,053 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 21 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter offers marginally more capacity – up to 14,100 L, about 1,100 L more than the Nissan Interstar.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Transporter carries substantially more – 2,607 kg compared to 1,447 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,160 kg.
The Ford Transit Transporter leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,900 - 73,000 £
|
Price
34,900 - 55,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 7.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
247 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
175 - 410 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
co2
0 - 195 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
3 - 7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,765 kg
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,535 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5,531 - 6,704 mm
|
Length
5,685 - 6,315 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,778 mm
|
Height
2,498 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
9,300 - 14,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
10,800 - 13,000 L
|
|
Payload
735 - 2,607 kg
|
Payload
965 - 1,447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
105 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
Max Speed
115 - 177 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
77 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,019 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|