Compare performance (269 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (39900 £ vs 36000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Renault Master Transporter?
In the bustling world of cargo vans, the Ford Transit and Renault Master are titans, each bringing their unique blend of engineering and innovation to the table. As the debate rages on over which transporter reigns supreme, let's delve into the technical aspects and recent innovations of these two impressive vehicles.
The Ford Transit offers a versatile engine lineup, featuring both diesel and electric options. With horsepower ranging from 105 to 269, the Transit is equipped to handle various demands. The diesel engines come with either a manual or automatic gearbox, while the electric variant boasts a reduction gearbox. For the eco-conscious, the Transit’s electric range reaches up to 317 km, powered by a 68 kWh battery. Torque is a strong point for Transit, offering between 310 and 430 Nm across its range.
Not to be outdone, the Renault Master matches the Transit with its own versatile engine choices. It offers diesel engines delivering between 105 and 180 HP, alongside an all-electric option. The Master’s top electric range hits 409 km, setting a high bar in the segment. Transmission options include both manual and automated manual gearboxes, providing a smooth driving experience. Torque stands robust as well, ranging from 245 to 400 Nm.
For fuel consumption, the Ford Transit offers competitive figures, with diesel variants consuming between 7.9 to 10.3 L/100km and electric consumption ranging from 21.3 to 32 kWh/100km. The Transit further offers an eco-friendly edge with its CO2 efficiency class ranging from A to G, reflecting its commitment to lower emissions.
The Renault Master shows its strengths in fuel efficiency as well. Diesel options have a consumption of 7.4 to 13.7 L/100km, and its electric variant ranges from 25.1 to 31 kWh/100km. Its CO2 efficiency classifications vary but include top scores, emphasizing Renault's push towards sustainability.
The Ford Transit measures a range of lengths from 5531 mm to 6704 mm, a width of 2059 mm, and height variations between 2530 mm and 2778 mm. This provides ample room for cargo and passengers, especially with payload capacities hitting up to 2607 kg.
The Renault Master slightly edges out in dimensions, boasting lengths from 5075 mm to 6875 mm. Its width spans up to 2080 mm with heights reaching 2808 mm. The Master supports substantial payloads as well, offering capacities exceeding 2000 kg in select models.
Both vehicles integrate innovations that advance comfort and utility for drivers and passengers. The Ford Transit comes with numerous seating configurations, offering 3 to 6 seats, tailored for varied business needs. The introduction of an all-wheel drive variant adds an extra level of adaptability on challenging road surfaces.
The Renault Master capitalizes on its spacious design, supporting configurations with up to 7 seats. Its modern touch includes advancements in automated manual transmissions and impressive acceleration metrics within its electric models, showcasing versatility.
Choosing between the Ford Transit and Renault Master depends largely on specific needs, whether it's maximum cargo space, superior electric range, or engine power. The Transit shines with its versatile configurations and robust eco-friendly technology, while the Master excels in range and spacious designs. Both models deliver innovations that keep them competitive in the ever-evolving transporter market, promising reliability, efficiency, and performance.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Master Transporter has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36000 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3938 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Master Transporter manages with 6.80 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.90 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Transit Transporter: with 21.30 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Renault Master Transporter with 22.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.40 kWh.
As for electric range, the Renault Master Transporter performs a bit better – achieving up to 448 km, about 46 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter has a evident edge – offering 269 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 99 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Renault Master Transporter performs noticeable better – reaching 176 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 56 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Transit Transporter pulls to a small extent stronger with 430 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
In curb weight, Ford Transit Transporter is hardly perceptible lighter – 2074 kg compared to 2128 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter performs hardly perceptible better – up to 14100 L, which is about 1100 L more than the Renault Master Transporter.
When it comes to payload, Ford Transit Transporter clearly perceptible takes the win – 2607 kg compared to 1859 kg. That’s a difference of about 748 kg.
The Ford Transit Transporter leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
details
The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39900 - 73000 £
|
Price
36000 - 55400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.7 - 22.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
247 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
445 - 448 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
co2
0 - 203 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2074 - 2765 kg
|
Curb weight
2128 - 2461 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5531 - 6704 mm
|
Length
5685 - 6315 mm
|
|
Width
2059 mm
|
Width
2080 mm
|
|
Height
2530 - 2778 mm
|
Height
2498 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
9300 - 14100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
10800 - 13000 L
|
|
Payload
735 - 2607 kg
|
Payload
1078 - 1859 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
105 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
Max Speed
90 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
77 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2019 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España