Compare performance (279 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (35,500 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot Boxer or Renault Master Transporter?
In the competitive world of commercial vehicles, the Peugeot Boxer and Renault Master Transporter stand out as two of the most reliable options for businesses requiring versatility, efficiency, and robust performance. This article delves into their noteworthy features, technical specifications, innovations, and what sets them apart in the transportation segment.
The Peugeot Boxer offers a range of diesel engine options that deliver power outputs of 120, 140, 165, and 136 HP, while the electric variant gives a silent and clean operation with ranges of up to 247 km. The Boxer has a maximum torque ranging from 260 to 370 Nm, making it an excellent choice for heavy loads. Fuel consumption figures range from 7.9 to 8.9 L/100km for diesel engines, ensuring cost-efficiency over long distances.
On the other hand, the Renault Master also boasts a robust lineup of diesel engines producing between 76 and 180 HP. This offers businesses a flexible choice depending on their specific load requirements and operating conditions. Torque figures peak at 400 Nm, enhancing its capability when dealing with heavier payloads. The Master outshines in fuel efficiency with consumption rates as low as 7.4 L/100km, alongside electric variants that achieve a range of 409 km.
The Boxer comes with multiple transmission options including manual and automatic gearboxes, thus catering to different driving preferences. Its front-wheel-drive layout contributes to better traction and handling, particularly under loaded conditions.
The Renault Master, however, provides a more diversified experience, offering both front-wheel and rear-wheel drive configurations. This flexibility helps maximize its load handling and enhances stability, especially when transporting heavier goods. The Master utilizes manual and automated manual transmissions for improved driving convenience.
When it comes to cargo dimensions, both vehicles are designed to optimize space. The Peugeot Boxer has a maximum length of 6363 mm, offering an impressive payload capacity that ranges up to 1835 kg. With a variety of body types and sizes, it can adapt to numerous commercial uses.
Conversely, the Renault Master provides a larger footprint, measuring up to 6875 mm in length. Its payload capacity can reach as much as 2073 kg, making it better suited for transporting heavier or bulkier items. This aspect can be a significant deciding factor for businesses focused on maximum load potential.
In terms of technology, the Peugeot Boxer integrates several advanced driver-assistance systems to enhance safety and ergonomics, including lane departure warning, parking sensors, and a connected infotainment system that keeps drivers informed and connected.
Renault also emphasizes innovation with the Master, incorporating a highly intuitive digital dashboard that provides relevant driving information at a glance. The vehicle features advanced connectivity options and certain models equipped with a full suite of driver assistance technologies aimed at minimizing accident risks and improving overall driving efficiency.
Choosing between the Peugeot Boxer and Renault Master Transporter ultimately hinges on your specific requirements. If you prioritize rear-wheel drive capabilities and a larger cargo space with competitive fuel efficiency, the Renault Master is likely your best bet. However, if you need a lighter and more agile van with commendable electric options, the Peugeot Boxer would be the ideal choice.
Both vans deliver impressive performance and versatility, showcasing the best of modern commercial vehicle engineering. Your decision should be guided by your operational needs, load requirements, and personal preference in driving dynamics.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot Boxer is marginally cheaper – starting at 35,500 £ , while the Renault Master Transporter costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,100 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Master Transporter uses 6.8 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Peugeot Boxer with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Master Transporter is somewhat more efficient: consuming 22.6 kWh/100km compared to 26.2 kWh/100km for the Peugeot Boxer. That’s a difference of about 3.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Master Transporter offers barely more range – reaching up to 448 km, about 24 km more than the Peugeot Boxer.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot Boxer offers markedly more power – delivering 279 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot Boxer delivers moderately more torque with 450 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Peugeot Boxer offers more seats – 7 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot Boxer is barely lighter – 2,075 kg compared to 2,128 kg. The difference is around 53 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Boxer carries somewhat more – 2,080 kg compared to 1,846 kg. That’s a difference of about 234 kg.
The Peugeot Boxer stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Peugeot Boxer wears its workmanlike practicality with a surprising amount of style, offering an interior that’s easy to live with for tradespeople and small businesses. It’s a sensible, no-nonsense choice if you need reliable load space and low running costs, with clever details that make daily life easier and an exterior that won’t embarrass when you arrive on site.
details
The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35,500 - 57,800 £
|
Price
38,600 - 54,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
26.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.6 - 25.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
424 km
|
Electric Range
177 - 448 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 233 g/km
|
co2
0 - 318 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 7
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,075 - 2,940 kg
|
Curb weight
2,128 - 2,598 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,050 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
560 - 2,080 kg
|
Payload
902 - 1,846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
120 - 279 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
320 - 450 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
88 - 205 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,184 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
|
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España