Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes Vito Transporter has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28800 £, while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39900 £. That’s a price difference of around 11151 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mercedes Vito Transporter manages with 6.80 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.90 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes Vito Transporter: with 21.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 21.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.10 kWh.
As for range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs evident better – achieving up to 474 km, about 157 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter has a a bit edge – offering 269 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs to a small extent better – reaching 140 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes Vito Transporter pulls to a small extent stronger with 500 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 6 vs 5.
In curb weight, Mercedes Vito Transporter is slight lighter – 1916 kg compared to 2074 kg. The difference is around 158 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter performs decisively better – up to 14100 L, which is about 7500 L more than the Mercedes Vito Transporter.
When it comes to payload, Ford Transit Transporter convincingly takes the win – 2607 kg compared to 884 kg. That’s a difference of about 1723 kg.
Overall, the Ford Transit Transporter shows itself to be won narrowly and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39900 - 69100 £
|
Price
28800 - 51600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
247 - 317 km
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2074 - 2765 kg
|
Curb weight
1916 - 2518 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5531 - 6704 mm
|
Length
4895 - 5390 mm
|
|
Width
2059 mm
|
Width
1928 mm
|
|
Height
2530 - 2778 mm
|
Height
1910 - 1945 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
9300 - 14100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3100 - 6600 L
|
|
Payload
735 - 2607 kg
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1950 - 1999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2019 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.