Compare performance (269 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (39900 £ vs 28800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Mercedes Vito Transporter?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes Vito Transporter has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28800 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11151 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mercedes Vito Transporter manages with 6.80 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.90 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes Vito Transporter: with 21.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 21.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.10 kWh.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs a bit better – achieving up to 474 km, about 72 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter has a a bit edge – offering 269 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs to a small extent better – reaching 140 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes Vito Transporter pulls to a small extent stronger with 500 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers to a small extent more seating capacity – 6 vs 5.
In curb weight, Mercedes Vito Transporter is slight lighter – 1916 kg compared to 2074 kg. The difference is around 158 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter performs decisively better – up to 14100 L, which is about 7500 L more than the Mercedes Vito Transporter.
When it comes to payload, Ford Transit Transporter convincingly takes the win – 2607 kg compared to 884 kg. That’s a difference of about 1723 kg.
The Ford Transit Transporter shows small but noticeable advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39900 - 73000 £
|
Price
28800 - 51600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
247 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2074 - 2765 kg
|
Curb weight
1916 - 2518 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5531 - 6704 mm
|
Length
4895 - 5390 mm
|
|
Width
2059 mm
|
Width
1928 mm
|
|
Height
2530 - 2778 mm
|
Height
1910 - 1945 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
9300 - 14100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3100 - 6600 L
|
|
Payload
735 - 2607 kg
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1950 - 1999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2019 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.