Compare performance (269 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (39,900 £ vs 28,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Mercedes Vito Transporter?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes Vito Transporter is noticeably cheaper – starting at 28,800 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 39,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,151 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes Vito Transporter uses 6.8 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Ford Transit Transporter with 7.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes Vito Transporter is marginally more efficient: consuming 21.2 kWh/100km compared to 21.3 kWh/100km for the Ford Transit Transporter. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 474 km, about 72 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers somewhat more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes Vito Transporter is slightly faster – reaching 140 km/h, while the Ford Transit Transporter tops out at 120 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Transporter delivers a bit more torque with 500 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Vito Transporter is only slightly lighter – 1,916 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 158 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Transporter offers significantly more capacity – up to 14,100 L, about 7,500 L more than the Mercedes Vito Transporter.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Transporter carries significantly more – 2,607 kg compared to 884 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,723 kg.
The Ford Transit Transporter is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,900 - 73,000 £
|
Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 10.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.3 - 32 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
247 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
68 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 270 g/km
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,765 kg
|
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5,531 - 6,704 mm
|
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,778 mm
|
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
9,300 - 14,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
|
|
Payload
735 - 2,607 kg
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
105 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
120 km/h
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 430 Nm
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
77 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,019 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|