Compare performance (269 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Mitsubishi Outlander?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mitsubishi Outlander is considerably cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24,461 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers considerably more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 317 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers somewhat more power – delivering 306 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
42,800 - 54,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
60 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,156 - 2,232 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
498 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,862 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
453 - 529 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
-
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|