VS

Honda CR-V vs Skoda Fabia comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 17,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or Skoda Fabia?

Honda CR-V vs Skoda Fabia: Key differences

Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • noticeably more trunk space

Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CR-V

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Fabia is significantly cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,466 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Skoda Fabia with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.

Fabia

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Honda CR-V offers very slightly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 177 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Fabia is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda CR-V delivers visibly more torque with 335 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm more.

CR-V

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Fabia is significantly lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,821 kg. The difference is around 678 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers noticeably more boot space – 617 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 237 L.

When it comes to payload, the Honda CR-V carries barely more – 475 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Honda CR-V is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,800
CR-V

Honda CR-V

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 78 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
If you want a brilliant little hatch that’s cheap to run, slips into tight parking and keeps boot space sensible, the Skoda Fabia is the clever everyday choice; the Skoda Kamiq, by contrast, dresses the same sensible Skoda DNA in a taller, more family-friendly crossover body with extra ride height …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Fabia

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896

Reviews Skoda Fabia

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Skoda Fabia
VW Golf
VS
In the compact car showdown between the Skoda Fabia and the VW Golf, both models offer impressive build quality typical of the Volkswagen Group. The Skoda Fabia shines with its exceptional value for money, providing ample space and practicality for urban driving. Meanwhile, the VW Golf maintains …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda CR‑V is the sensible family SUV — cavernous boot, comfortable ride and rock‑solid reliability that keeps running costs down, while the Volvo XC40 tempts you with Scandi styling, cutting‑edge safety tech and a more premium, tactile cabin. Choose the CR‑V for everyday practicality and …
Honda CR-V
Lexus NX
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Lexus NX stand out for their unique strengths. While the CR-V impresses with its spacious interior and fuel efficiency, the Lexus NX offers a more luxurious feel and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these …
Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Audi A1
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the compact car showdown, the Audi A1 and Skoda Fabia each bring distinct offerings to the table. The Audi A1 stands out with its premium feel and technology-laden interior, appealing to those who value luxury in a small package. Meanwhile, the Skoda Fabia offers impressive practicality and …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the ongoing battle of compact hatchbacks, the Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia have both staked their claim for supremacy. The Clio boasts a stylish design and a reputation for comfort, often appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and innovative tech in their daily drive. Meanwhile, the Fabia …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
Price
17,300 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
78 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 - 152 g/km
co2
112 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,278 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
380 L
Length
-
Length
4,108 - 4,137 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Height
-
Height
1,458 - 1,459 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,190 L
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
402 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
175 - 228 km/h
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Honda
Brand
Skoda
Is the Honda CR-V offered with different drivetrains?

The Honda CR-V is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.