VS

Honda ZR-V vs Mitsubishi ASX – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda ZR-V or Mitsubishi ASX?

ZR-V @ Honda

Battle of the Compact SUVs: Honda ZR-V vs Mitsubishi ASX

In the burgeoning world of compact SUVs, the competition is as fierce as ever. Two models that stand tall in this segment are the Honda ZR-V and the Mitsubishi ASX. Both offer unique blends of style, performance, and technology, but which one truly stands out? Our meticulous comparison pits these two competitors against each other, focusing on technical aspects and innovations.

ASX @ Mitsubishi

Under the Hood: Power and Efficiency

The Honda ZR-V sits at the forefront of innovation with its full hybrid engine, boasting 184 HP and a torque of 315 Nm provided by its 4-cylinder engine. This powertrain promises an impressive fuel efficiency, with consumption figures ranging from 5.7 to 5.8 L/100km. The ZR-V’s performance is further enhanced by its acceleration capabilities, sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7.9 to 8 seconds, and reaching a maximum speed of 173 km/h. Such efficiency becomes evident in its CO2 output, rated between 130-132 g/km.

The Mitsubishi ASX, meanwhile, brings versatility with multiple powertrains, ranging from petrol to mild hybrids. Its full hybrid variant offers 143 HP and a maximum torque of 260 Nm. With a slightly less frugal consumption of 4.7 to 6 L/100km, it balances performance with practicality. The ASX provides robust acceleration capabilities, reaching 100 km/h in as little as 8.5 seconds, matching a top speed of 180 km/h. Notably, its compact engine variants result in CO2 emissions as low as 107 g/km, enhancing its eco-friendly appeal.

ZR-V @ Honda

Design and Dimensions

When it comes to size and space, the Honda ZR-V asserts itself with a body length of 4568 mm and a wheelbase that translates to spacious interiors, accommodating five seats comfortably. The ZR-V stands 1613 mm tall, with a width of 1840 mm, ensuring an imposing road presence. It delivers practicality with a 380 L trunk capacity, suitable for family outings and adventures.

In comparison, the Mitsubishi ASX is slightly more compact. It measures 4239 mm in length and 1797 mm in width, providing a slightly more nimble stance on urban roads. Despite its smaller size, the ASX does not skimp on storage, offering a generous trunk capacity of 484 L, thus making it an ideal choice for those who prioritize cargo space within a compact frame.

ASX @ Mitsubishi

Driving Dynamics and Comfort

Both vehicles offer modern driving experiences, thanks to their focus on comfort and control. The ZR-V is equipped with front-wheel drive, promising a high level of stability and handling. Its curb weight, ranging between 1660 to 1710 kg, balances agility with a planted ride, ensuring confidence under various driving conditions.

The ASX also opts for front-wheel drive, maximizing fuel efficiency and offering straightforward handling in urban environments. Its various engine options allow for different curb weights, starting from a lightweight 1296 kg up to 1501 kg, enabling buyers to choose a balance between performance and economy that suits their needs.

ZR-V @ Honda

Final Thoughts: Which SUV Comes Out on Top?

Choosing between the Honda ZR-V and Mitsubishi ASX boils down to specific preferences and needs. The ZR-V, with its potent hybrid engine and quick acceleration, offers a more dynamic driving experience wrapped in a spacious and comfortable package. On the other hand, the ASX excels in versatility and practicality, with a broader range of powertrain options and a larger trunk capacity, making it highly suitable for urban dwellers seeking efficiency with occasional power.

Ultimately, the better choice will depend on individual priorities. Whether it's the high-tech innovation and performance of the Honda ZR-V or the diverse versatility and compact efficiency of the Mitsubishi ASX, both models hold their ground firmly in the competitive world of compact SUVs.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX @ Mitsubishi

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi ASX has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £, while the Honda ZR-V costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 16209 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Honda ZR-V with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

ZR-V @ Honda

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Honda ZR-V has a somewhat edge – offering 184 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Honda ZR-V is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.50 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mitsubishi ASX performs barely noticeable better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Honda ZR-V tops out at 173 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Honda ZR-V pulls somewhat stronger with 315 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm difference.

ASX @ Mitsubishi

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is noticeable lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1660 kg. The difference is around 364 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers clearly perceptible more room – 484 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs a bit better – up to 1596 L, which is about 284 L more than the Honda ZR-V.

When it comes to payload, Honda ZR-V barely noticeable takes the win – 455 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi ASX proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi ASX is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £20,600
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 91 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L
details

Honda ZR-V

5 (1)
rate

The Honda ZR-V is a standout in the compact SUV segment, offering a blend of sleek design and practical functionality. Its exterior is characterized by dynamic lines and a bold grille, capturing attention on the road. Inside, the ZR-V impresses with a comfortable and well-appointed cabin, providing drivers and passengers with a refined driving experience.

details
440009_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
440010_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
440007_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
440004_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
440008_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439994_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439993_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439991_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439989_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439988_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439986_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439984_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439981_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439980_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439978_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439979_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439971_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1)
rate

The Mitsubishi ASX presents itself as a compact crossover that combines practicality with style. Its sleek design and versatile interior make it an appealing choice for both urban and rural settings. With a focus on providing a comfortable driving experience, the ASX also offers a range of modern features that enhance connectivity and safety.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low @ Mitsubishi
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low @ Mitsubishi
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low @ Mitsubishi
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low @ Mitsubishi

Similar Comparisons

Honda ZR-V
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Honda ZR‑V brings sharper handling and a more premium-feeling cabin, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a bit of sparkle for everyday practicality, fuel-sipping reliability and stronger resale prospects. If you want a compact SUV that’s slightly more fun to drive and feels a touch upmarket, take the ZR‑V; if you need a fuss-free, roomy runabout that’s kinder to the wallet over time, the Corolla Cross is the smarter, safer bet.
Honda HR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
In the battle between the Honda HR-V and the Honda ZR-V, both vehicles offer distinct advantages tailored for diverse consumer needs. The HR-V stands out with its spacious interior and practicality, making it a favorite among small families and urban drivers seeking versatility. On the other hand, the ZR-V brings a more refined design and advanced technology features, appealing to those who value a premium feel in a compact SUV package.
Honda ZR-V
Mitsubishi ASX
ZR-V
ASX

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 40400 £
Price
20600 - 32500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 5.8 L
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
130 - 132 g/km
co2
99 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
57 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1660 - 1710 kg
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
Trunk capacity
370 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Length
4568 mm
Length
4239 mm
Width
1840 mm
Width
1797 mm
Height
1613 mm
Height
1575 mm
Max trunk capacity
1291 - 1312 L
Max trunk capacity
1458 - 1596 L
Payload
440 - 455 kg
Payload
397 - 449 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
-
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
Max Speed
173 km/h
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
Torque
315 Nm
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1993 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Honda
Brand
Mitsubishi

Similar Comparisons

Honda ZR-V
Hyundai Tucson
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Honda ZR-V and Hyundai Tucson offer enticing options for buyers. The Honda ZR-V shines with its sporty performance and agile handling, making it a joy to drive through urban environments. Meanwhile, the Hyundai Tucson impresses with its roomy interior and advanced technology features, providing families with a comfortable and connected ride.
Ford Kuga
Honda ZR-V
VS
In the mid-size SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Honda ZR-V both stand out with their distinct attributes catering to varied driver preferences. The Ford Kuga impresses with its dynamic handling and robust engine options, delivering a spirited drive alongside state-of-the-art connectivity features. Meanwhile, the Honda ZR-V shines with its exceptional fuel efficiency and spacious interior, promising comfort and practicality for family adventures.
Honda ZR-V
Subaru Crosstrek
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Honda ZR-V impresses with its sleek design and tech-savvy interior, rivaling the seasoned Subaru Crosstrek's reputation for rugged reliability and off-road capabilities. The ZR-V offers a sporty driving experience with its agile handling, while the Crosstrek stays true to its all-terrain prowess with standard all-wheel drive. Both vehicles present strong competition, catering to different lifestyle needs – urban commuters might favor the ZR-V's modern amenities, whereas adventure seekers could opt for the Crosstrek's robustness.
Mitsubishi ASX
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki Vitara stand out with their distinctive styling and practicality. While the ASX offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, the Vitara impresses with its off-road capabilities and zippy handling. Ultimately, choosing between these two models comes down to whether you prioritize everyday comfort or adventurous versatility.
Honda ZR-V
Lexus UX
VS
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive realm of compact crossovers, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki S-Cross offer distinct value propositions for discerning buyers. The ASX impresses with its robust design and spacious interior, making it a practical choice for families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Suzuki S-Cross stands out for its fuel efficiency and advanced safety features, appealing to those who prioritize economy and peace of mind on the road.
Mitsubishi ASX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Mitsubishi ASX stands out with its robust design and practicality, making it an ideal choice for urban adventurers. In contrast, the Toyota Yaris Cross combines sporty aesthetics with impressive fuel efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers without compromising on style. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, offering unique strengths that cater to diverse customer needs.
What drivetrain options does the Honda ZR-V have?

The Honda ZR-V is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.