Compare performance (184 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda ZR-V or Mitsubishi ASX?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the burgeoning world of compact SUVs, the competition is as fierce as ever. Two models that stand tall in this segment are the Honda ZR-V and the Mitsubishi ASX. Both offer unique blends of style, performance, and technology, but which one truly stands out? Our meticulous comparison pits these two competitors against each other, focusing on technical aspects and innovations.
The Honda ZR-V sits at the forefront of innovation with its full hybrid engine, boasting 184 HP and a torque of 315 Nm provided by its 4-cylinder engine. This powertrain promises an impressive fuel efficiency, with consumption figures ranging from 5.7 to 5.8 L/100km. The ZR-V’s performance is further enhanced by its acceleration capabilities, sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7.9 to 8 seconds, and reaching a maximum speed of 173 km/h. Such efficiency becomes evident in its CO2 output, rated between 130-132 g/km.
The Mitsubishi ASX, meanwhile, brings versatility with multiple powertrains, ranging from petrol to mild hybrids. Its full hybrid variant offers 143 HP and a maximum torque of 260 Nm. With a slightly less frugal consumption of 4.7 to 6 L/100km, it balances performance with practicality. The ASX provides robust acceleration capabilities, reaching 100 km/h in as little as 8.5 seconds, matching a top speed of 180 km/h. Notably, its compact engine variants result in CO2 emissions as low as 107 g/km, enhancing its eco-friendly appeal.
When it comes to size and space, the Honda ZR-V asserts itself with a body length of 4568 mm and a wheelbase that translates to spacious interiors, accommodating five seats comfortably. The ZR-V stands 1613 mm tall, with a width of 1840 mm, ensuring an imposing road presence. It delivers practicality with a 380 L trunk capacity, suitable for family outings and adventures.
In comparison, the Mitsubishi ASX is slightly more compact. It measures 4239 mm in length and 1797 mm in width, providing a slightly more nimble stance on urban roads. Despite its smaller size, the ASX does not skimp on storage, offering a generous trunk capacity of 484 L, thus making it an ideal choice for those who prioritize cargo space within a compact frame.
Both vehicles offer modern driving experiences, thanks to their focus on comfort and control. The ZR-V is equipped with front-wheel drive, promising a high level of stability and handling. Its curb weight, ranging between 1660 to 1710 kg, balances agility with a planted ride, ensuring confidence under various driving conditions.
The ASX also opts for front-wheel drive, maximizing fuel efficiency and offering straightforward handling in urban environments. Its various engine options allow for different curb weights, starting from a lightweight 1296 kg up to 1501 kg, enabling buyers to choose a balance between performance and economy that suits their needs.
Choosing between the Honda ZR-V and Mitsubishi ASX boils down to specific preferences and needs. The ZR-V, with its potent hybrid engine and quick acceleration, offers a more dynamic driving experience wrapped in a spacious and comfortable package. On the other hand, the ASX excels in versatility and practicality, with a broader range of powertrain options and a larger trunk capacity, making it highly suitable for urban dwellers seeking efficiency with occasional power.
Ultimately, the better choice will depend on individual priorities. Whether it's the high-tech innovation and performance of the Honda ZR-V or the diverse versatility and compact efficiency of the Mitsubishi ASX, both models hold their ground firmly in the competitive world of compact SUVs.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mitsubishi ASX is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Honda ZR-V costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,637 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Honda ZR-V with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Honda ZR-V offers slightly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Honda ZR-V is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.8 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda ZR-V delivers visibly more torque with 315 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is noticeably lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,660 kg. The difference is around 364 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Honda ZR-V carries only slightly more – 455 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
The Mitsubishi ASX is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Honda ZR-V blends smart practicality with sharper styling than you might expect, giving buyers a calm, competent companion for daily life. Inside it's comfortable and cleverly laid out, easy to live with and never trying too hard to be exciting.
details
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35,100 - 38,700 £
|
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
130 - 132 g/km
|
co2
99 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,660 - 1,710 kg
|
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
440 - 455 kg
|
Payload
397 - 445 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
315 Nm
|
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España