VS

Hyundai Kona vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Mazda CX-60?

Hyundai Kona vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • clearly lighter
details

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Hyundai Kona is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,614 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona offers significantly more range – reaching up to 514 km, about 451 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 7.8 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers significantly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 285 Nm more.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is clearly lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 520 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers a bit more boot space – 570 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries somewhat more – 612 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 122 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km
Hyundai Kona
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
Hyundai Kona
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,100 - 41,600 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
48.4 - 65.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
4,355 - 4,385 mm
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,580 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,300 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
162 - 172 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.