Compare performance (204 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Mitsubishi ASX?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
With the compact SUV market becoming increasingly competitive, two models that have caught the attention of consumers are the Hyundai Kona and the Mitsubishi ASX. Both hailing from respected manufacturers, these vehicles offer distinct experiences along with modern features. Let's delve into a comparative analysis to see how they stack up against each other.
The Hyundai Kona offers a versatile lineup of powertrains, with options including petrol, full hybrid, and electric variants. Its top power output reaches an impressive 218 HP, with acceleration from 0-100 km/h as quick as 7.8 seconds. With maximum speeds topping out at 208 km/h, the Kona promises a thrilling drive for speed enthusiasts.
Conversely, the Mitsubishi ASX, available in petrol and mild hybrid versions, caps its power output at 158 HP. It features a decent acceleration capability, reaching 0-100 km/h in 8.5 seconds, and a maximum speed of 180 km/h. The ASX is positioned more as a practical commuter rather than a high-performance vehicle.
Efficiency is crucial in today's eco-conscious world. The Kona delivers strong fuel efficiency with its hybrid and electric variants. The consumption ranges from 4.5 L/100 km for hybrids to 14.6-16.8 kWh/100 km for electric models. Its electric version offers a commendable range of up to 514 km on a single charge.
The ASX presents competitive fuel consumption figures, with its hybrids consuming as little as 4.7 L/100 km. However, unlike the Kona, the ASX does not provide a full electric option, focusing instead on its combustion and mild hybrid engines.
Design wise, both SUVs display contemporary aesthetics. The Hyundai Kona measures between 4350 and 4385 mm in length, providing a slightly larger footprint compared to the ASX’s 4239 mm length. Where the Kona stands out is in its width and height, offering a more spacious interior feel and enhanced road presence.
The Mitsubishi ASX, though more compact, boasts a well-utilized interior space with a trunk capacity ranging up to 484 liters, surpassing the Kona’s 466 liters. This makes the ASX more suited for families who prioritize storage space.
Both vehicles come equipped with modern automotive technologies. Hyundai's Kona is available with front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, supported by manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, adding driving flexibility. The ASX, on the other hand, offers only a front-wheel-drive option and a choice between manual and automatic transmissions.
Inside, the Kona leverages Hyundai's latest infotainment system, catering to tech-savvy drivers, while the ASX ensures a connected experience with Mitsubishi's integrated multimedia solutions. Both models offer essential safety features, yet the Kona tends to offer more advanced driver-assistance technologies.
The Hyundai Kona and Mitsubishi ASX cater to different audiences. The Kona offers a broader array of powertrain options, making it ideal for those seeking versatility and innovation, particularly with its hybrid and electric models. Meanwhile, the Mitsubishi ASX appeals with its practical design and storage capacity, making it a reliable choice for families and city dwellers.
Ultimately, the decision between the two will hinge on individual preferences and priorities, whether they're inclined towards performance and innovation or practicality and simplicity.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mitsubishi ASX is barely cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,637 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.3 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers clearly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers only slightly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is only slightly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 74 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers barely more boot space – 484 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.
When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries marginally more – 490 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.
The Hyundai Kona is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.
details
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 41,900 £
|
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
99 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
|
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
397 - 445 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España