VS

Hyundai Kona vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Toyota C-HR?

Hyundai Kona vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • only slightly lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kona

Hyundai Kona vs Toyota C-HR — two compact SUVs, two clear philosophies

The Hyundai Kona and the Toyota C-HR arrive at the same segment from opposite directions: the Kona prioritises everyday space, straightforward usability and a comfortable, low-stress experience, while the C-HR sells a compact, efficient and design-forward package with a stronger focus on economy. That difference is visible the moment you open the doors—the Kona feels purpose-built for hauling people and stuff, the C-HR for looking good and drinking as little fuel as possible. Each car brings modern safety and infotainment but applies them differently, so your priorities—practicality versus image and efficiency—determine which feels like the better fit. This comparison will focus on how those philosophies translate to real-life comfort, usability, long-distance behaviour and buyer fit rather than spec sheets.

C-HR

Driving character and everyday usability

The Hyundai Kona drives like an accommodating companion: light steering, predictable responses and a suspension tuned for calm city and regional roads rather than corner-carving thrills. The Toyota C-HR rewards precise inputs with a more taut, composed feel but exposes its drivetrain personality under load—very economical, yet sometimes noisy and insistent when you demand strong acceleration. In town both are easy to place, but the Kona’s gentler steering and smaller turning circle make tight manoeuvres less stressful; the C-HR’s sharper steering makes it feel more alert but also less forgiving in stop‑start parking. If you prize relaxed commuting and easy parking choose the Kona; if you prefer a sharper, more engaging steering feel and accept some drivetrain quirks, the C-HR leans in that direction.

Kona

Cabin comfort, materials and rear-seat reality

The interior of the Toyota C-HR aims higher in perceived quality with cleaner graphics and tactile touches that feel a step up when you sit in the front seats, giving it a slightly more premium presence. The Hyundai Kona, by contrast, trades a bit of that perceived polish for a more practical, roomy cabin layout—controls are clearer, displays are easy to read and storage feels sensible rather than showy. Crucially, rear-seat experience separates them: the Kona genuinely offers more head- and leg-room and a brighter feel for rear passengers, whereas the C-HR’s sloping roofline and smaller windows make the back feel tighter and darker. So for tall passengers or frequent rear-seat occupants the Kona will be noticeably more comfortable, while couples or solo commuters who value style and front-cabin ambience will appreciate the C-HR’s presentation.

C-HR

Practicality and everyday luggage handling

Here the Kona’s strengths are obvious: a larger, more usable boot, sensible opening and lower sill make loading shopping, buggies or suitcases a less awkward task than in the C-HR. The C-HR’s cargo space is more compromised by its design, with a higher loading lip and a shallower, more awkward shape that punishes bulky items—PHEV variants amplify that compromise further. The Kona also offers more flexible rear-seat folding arrangements on higher trims, which translates into real-world adaptability on weekends or holidays. If you frequently carry gear, family kit or need flexible cargo space, the Kona is the more pragmatic choice; the C-HR is acceptable for lighter, design-conscious urban use but feels limiting for regular utility needs.

Kona

Long-distance behaviour, efficiency and running impressions

On longer journeys the Kona tends to deliver a quieter, more relaxed experience—particularly in its electric form—making motorway miles feel less tiring and more effortless. The C-HR is economical in operation and excels at low-consumption driving, especially in hybrid or plug‑in form, which benefits commuters and company-car buyers, but its drivetrain can become noticeably vocal when pushed and the cabin can feel busier under sustained full-throttle demands. Both cars are stable on the motorway, but the Kona’s calmer noise profile and more compliant ride edge it towards greater cruising comfort, while the C-HR rewards those who prioritise low running costs and short electric commutes despite the trade-off in noise under load. Choose the C-HR when fuel efficiency and PHEV tax/commute benefits are primary; pick the Kona for quieter, less tiring long-distance cruising and more relaxed highway composure.

C-HR

Who should pick which car — buyer-fit and practical recommendations

If your life involves family school runs, regular luggage, rear passengers or you simply want a forgiving, easy-to-live-with compact SUV, the Hyundai Kona will likely satisfy more days of your week with less compromise. If you are a design-conscious city commuter, a company-car driver who benefits from low CO2 and electric commuting, or someone who values a slightly more premium front cabin and sharper steering, the Toyota C-HR is a compelling, efficient choice despite its tighter rear seats and smaller boot. Both cars have clear strengths, so match the Kona to people who prioritise space, comfort and straightforward usability, and match the C-HR to buyers who prioritise economy, looks and a refined front-cabin feel. The technical comparison that follows will make the specific performance, range and equipment trade-offs easier to quantify for your decision.

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross comes down to whether you prefer the C-HR’s sharper styling and firmer, more engaging ride or the Yaris Cross’s roomier practicality and better efficiency. I’ll compare their driving feel, interior comfort, fuel economy, and features to …
Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Toyota Yaris Cross are two leading subcompact crossover SUVs that suit buyers wanting compact size, efficient powertrains and easy city driving. This comparison looks at how the Kona and Yaris Cross differ in driving feel, interior space, practicality and ownership costs so you …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Hyundai Kona is visibly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,563 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Hyundai Kona with 4.6 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona offers considerably more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 444 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers barely more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 19 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is only slightly lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 135 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers barely more boot space – 466 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 19 L.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries a bit more – 490 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 380 - 510 km
details
Hyundai Kona
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
Paul Corkish
8 Jun 2026, 11:47:29

About to buy my new 3rd Kona (2nd N line Hybrid)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Austin
21 May 2026, 19:30:33

Better fit for is 6'3" people

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
TOTO
20 May 2026, 11:23:42

The Kona is an SUV that delivers, especially in terms of driving comfort. It's noticeably easier to get into and settle into as you get older. Less feisty than the MG4 but slightly more economical.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans
23 Apr 2026, 11:02:05

More modern car with much more advanced technology than the S-Cross. The S-Cross is functional, economical and good, but dated.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gorguet
10 Apr 2026, 07:38:34

Good car overall, but the finish isn't top‑notch — the paint is very fragile and chips at the slightest knock.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
Jan
16 May 2026, 20:51:01

Great driving comfort, admittedly short trips, but above all a cool impression.

Rav is for wimps.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Sam baba
25 Apr 2026, 21:54:02

Reliability and no maintenance costs, plus a futuristic design.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla comes down to whether you want a compact crossover's higher driving position and distinctive styling or a traditional compact car's practicality and efficiency. The C-HR emphasizes bold looks and a more SUV-like feel, while the Corolla …
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers with similar footprints but aimed at different buyers. The LBX prioritizes premium materials, a quieter ride and upscale features, while the C-HR emphasizes bold styling, engaging handling and stronger value for money.
Lexus UX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus UX and Toyota C-HR are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers who want agile packaging and distinctive style. The UX leans on Lexus-level refinement and a premium cabin, while the C-HR emphasizes bolder styling and strong value for money.
Omoda 5
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Omoda 5 brings bold, modern styling and a tech-forward package, while the Toyota C‑HR emphasizes distinctive design, proven reliability and a refined hybrid powertrain. This comparison covers practicality, driving character, equipment and running costs to help you decide which compact crossover …
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Škoda Elroq are close rivals in the small-to-compact SUV segment — this quick comparison will help you spot the practical differences that matter. The Kona is a nimble, tech-rich option with multiple powertrain choices (including electric), while the Elroq prioritizes …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV3 comes down to whether you prefer a well-established compact crossover with a proven track record or a newer electric contender focused on efficiency and modern tech. I’ll walk you through how they compare across range, practicality, driving feel and …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV2
VS
Here’s a head-to-head look at the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV2, two compact crossovers that aim to deliver efficient electric driving with practical everyday usability. I’ll compare the essentials—range, charging, interior space, driving feel and running costs—so you can pick the one that fits your …
Hyundai Kona
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,600 - 41,900 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Toyota
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.