VS

Hyundai Kona vs Skoda Scala comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Skoda Scala?

Hyundai Kona vs Skoda Scala: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Scala

4.9 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • a bit lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kona

Battle of the Segments: Hyundai Kona vs Skoda Scala

The automotive world is brimming with choices, and today we are pitting two standout models against each other: the Hyundai Kona, a compact SUV rich with innovations, and the Skoda Scala, a versatile hatchback renowned for efficiency. Whether you're searching for tech-forward features or a blend of practicality and style, these 2024 models promise to cater to diverse tastes and needs. Let's dive into the technical aspects and innovations that set these cars apart.

Scala

Engines and Performance

The Hyundai Kona comes in a wide range of engine configurations, including petrol, full hybrid, and electric. This diversity gives it a significant edge in terms of adaptability to different driving needs. The Kona's power output varies from 100 to 218 HP, with top models accelerating from 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.8 seconds. In contrast, the Skoda Scala focuses on petrol powertrains with outputs ranging from 95 to 150 HP, achieving 0-100 km/h acceleration in up to 8.2 seconds. While the Kona provides a thrilling all-wheel-drive option, the Scala offers front-wheel drive, maintaining its efficiency-first approach.

Kona

Fuel Efficiency and Eco-Friendliness

The fuel efficiency and ecological footprint of a vehicle are paramount for today's buyers. The Hyundai Kona showcases hybrid and electric models, boasting a remarkable electric range of up to 514 km and a modest consumption of 14.6 to 16.8 kWh/100km in its electric variant. Petrol variants maintain a competitive consumption of 4.5 to 6.7 L/100km. When it comes to CO2 efficiency, Kona’s best class is 'A', delivering zero emissions in the EV model. The Scala focuses purely on petrol engines, offering an efficient consumption range of 5.1 to 5.6 L/100km and maintaining CO2 levels between 115 and 127 g/km, also achieving a commendable 'C' efficiency classification.

Scala

Design and Dimensions

When looking at design, the Kona stands out with its distinct SUV style, measuring between 4350 to 4385 mm in length, with a wider stance of 1825 mm, lending an authoritative presence on the road. Meanwhile, the Scala's sleek hatchback approach spans a length of 4362 mm and a slightly narrower width of 1793 mm, embracing an urban-friendly design without compromising on interior space.

Kona

Interior and Practicality

Both vehicles comfortably accommodate five passengers, yet their approach to storage differs. The Hyundai Kona offers a trunk capacity of 466 liters, sufficient for most lifestyle needs. The Scala edges ahead in practicality, with a trunk capacity of 467 liters. Furthermore, the Scala's efficient use of space aligns with its compact exterior, making it a practical choice for urban drives and weekend getaways.

Scala

Innovation and Technology

Innovation is at the core of both models. The Kona integrates technological marvels across its electric and hybrid variants with forward-thinking features like a dual-clutch automatic transmission and advanced reduction gearbox for its electric models. The Scala combs through the realms of practicality with effective manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions coupled with state-of-the-art infotainment systems providing an intuitive driving experience.

Kona

Conclusion

Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Skoda Scala ultimately depends on one's driving preferences and lifestyle needs. The Kona appeals to those looking for versatility with its broad offering of powertrains and tech-forward driving aids. Conversely, the Scala remains a go-to for those prioritizing efficiency, interior space, and an overall straightforward, reliable driving experience. Each car comes from a lineage of innovation and reliability, ensuring either choice is a worthwhile investment for the future.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Scala is only slightly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Hyundai Kona costs 23,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,629 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Skoda Scala with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

Scala

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers clearly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Skoda Scala takes 8.2 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers very slightly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Scala is a bit lighter – 1,199 kg compared to 1,370 kg. The difference is around 171 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Scala offers barely more boot space – 467 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 1 L.

When it comes to payload, the Hyundai Kona carries somewhat more – 490 kg compared to 431 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,100
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 380 - 510 km
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Scala

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details

Skoda Scala

The Skoda Scala is a tidy, no-nonsense hatch that wraps clever packaging and composed manners into a compact, grown-up package. It’s the sensible choice for buyers who want everyday practicality with a dash of style and personality—no drama, just reliable charm.

details
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Scala

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,100 - 41,900 £
Price
21,400 - 31,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
114 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
1,199 - 1,271 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
467 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
403 - 431 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.