Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jaguar F-Pace vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (575 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (56400 £ vs 275400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar F-Pace or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?
F-Pace
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jaguar F-Pace has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 56400 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 219000 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jaguar F-Pace manages with 1.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L. The difference is about 14.20 L per 100 km.
F-Pace
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan has a barely noticeable edge – offering 600 HP compared to 575 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan takes 4.90 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Rolls-Royce Cullinan pulls evident stronger with 900 Nm compared to 700 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
F-Pace
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jaguar F-Pace is distinct lighter – 1951 kg compared to 2660 kg. The difference is around 709 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers somewhat more room – 555 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 85 L.
When it comes to payload, Rolls-Royce Cullinan clearly perceptible takes the win – 840 kg compared to 589 kg. That’s a difference of about 251 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jaguar F-Pace is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Jaguar F-Pace
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £56,400
Jaguar F-Pace
Jaguar F-Pace
5 (1 Reviews)
Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.
details
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.
details
Jaguar F-Pace
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
56400 - 100800 £
|
Price
275400 - 324600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L
|
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
41 - 274 g/km
|
co2
363 - 380 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1951 - 2230 kg
|
Curb weight
2660 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
|
Trunk capacity
555 L
|
|
Length
4747 - 4762 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1936 mm
|
Width
2000 mm
|
|
Height
1664 - 1670 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1299 - 1428 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
457 - 589 kg
|
Payload
840 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
|
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
|
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
Number of Cylinders
12
|
|
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
|
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 5000 cm3
|
Engine capacity
6749 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Rolls-Royce
|
What drive types are available for the Jaguar F-Pace?
Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.