Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Jeep Compass vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (225 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Jeep Compass vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
Compass
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Jeep Compass is visibly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,085 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Jeep Compass offers substantially more range – reaching up to 500 km, about 433 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers a bit more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 44 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers noticeably more torque with 540 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 195 Nm more.
Compass
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Compass is marginally lighter – 1,667 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 125 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jeep Compass offers moderately more boot space – 550 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 78 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries noticeably more – 600 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 127 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jeep Compass is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £34,200
Jeep Compass
Jeep Compass
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Jeep Compass
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
472 - 473 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.