Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jeep Compass vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (213 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 43300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Compass
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jeep Compass has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9085 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque manages with 3.70 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Jeep Compass with 5.80 L. The difference is about 2.10 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Jeep Compass performs significantly better – achieving up to 500 km, about 440 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 269 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 56 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8.50 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque performs to a small extent better – reaching 213 km/h, while the Jeep Compass tops out at 188 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls noticeable stronger with 540 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 195 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Compass
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Compass is minimal lighter – 1667 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 125 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Jeep Compass offers somewhat more room – 550 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 78 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jeep Compass performs evident better – up to 1561 L, which is about 405 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jeep Compass is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Jeep Compass
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £34,200
Jeep Compass
Jeep Compass
2.3 (2 Reviews)
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
1 (1 Reviews)
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Jeep Compass
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 43200 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.80 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
500 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1667 - 2198 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4552 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1928 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1675 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1561 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 213 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drivetrain options does the Jeep Compass have?
The Jeep Compass is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.