Compare performance (414 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (36,000 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – KGM Musso EV or KGM Musso?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
KGM Musso is barely cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the KGM Musso EV costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,571 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the KGM Musso EV offers considerably more power – delivering 414 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 212 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Musso EV delivers noticeably more torque with 678 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 237 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, KGM Musso is only slightly lighter – 2,070 kg compared to 2,165 kg. The difference is around 95 kg.
When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso carries somewhat more – 1,085 kg compared to 905 kg. That’s a difference of about 180 kg.
The KGM Musso EV holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.
details
The Musso is a rugged, no-nonsense pickup that balances practical utility with a comfortable cabin, making it equally at home on a jobsite or a weekend drive. It’s a sensible choice for drivers who want straightforward capability, durability and a reassuringly solid feel without unnecessary complexity.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
|
Price
33,400 - 44,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
8.5 - 9.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
223 - 246 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
|
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
Width
1,950 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
805 - 905 kg
|
Payload
860 - 1,085 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
|
Torque
400 - 441 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
|
Power kW
149 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
KGM
|
Brand
KGM
|