Compare performance (281 HP vs 414 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or KGM Musso EV?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
KGM Musso EV is markedly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,448 £.
As for electric range, the KGM Musso EV offers clearly more range – reaching up to 420 km, about 378 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the KGM Musso EV offers markedly more power – delivering 414 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the KGM Musso EV is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers only slightly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 678 Nm. That’s about 19 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, KGM Musso EV is moderately lighter – 2,165 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 240 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries very slightly more – 989 kg compared to 905 kg. That’s a difference of about 84 kg.
The KGM Musso EV holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
detailsThe Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
805 - 905 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
KGM
|